My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
BOOK 23_1950-05-15 to 1952-04-21
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Minutes
>
1950 to 1952 Book 23
>
BOOK 23_1950-05-15 to 1952-04-21
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/12/2017 4:19:34 PM
Creation date
10/12/2017 3:43:56 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Type
Regular
Agency Type
City Council
Date
5/15/1950
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
511
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
442 <br />CITIZENS CHARTER STUDY COMMITTEE REPORT. <br />Mr. Howard Magee, chairman, advised that the <br />committee was now ready to submit their recommendations and turned in six copies of <br />this report. On motion of Caouncilman Morgan, seconded by Councilman Spillers, the <br />Committee's report was accepted with an expression of thanks to the committee for <br />this long and arduous job. Motion carried. City Attorney Currie stated that this <br />matter would have to be studied by the Council within the very near future in order <br />to get the propositions on the ballot for the April election. <br />PROPOSED WIDENING OF VALOTA ROAD. Mayor Britschgi stated that -the residents had contact <br />him to find out what progress had been made in this proposed street widening prograt <br />City Engineer Jain stated he had made a rough estimate of 45,000 in order to es- <br />tablish two lane pavement and in his opinion Valota Road could be declared a street <br />of major importance and thereby become eligible for gas tax money. He stated that <br />the block between Redwood Avenue and Silver Avenue was in very bad shape and that <br />curbs and sidewalks were needed in this area. After further discussion it was <br />decided this question be referred back to the Planning Commission for further study <br />and City Clerk Dodge was directed to so inform the Planning Commission requesting <br />further study and recommendations on setback, plan lines, etc. <br />REQUEST FOR USED CAR DEALER PERMIT. Mr. Stevenson, representing Cardinal Motor Company <br />of Palo Alto addressed the Council advising that through a misunderstanding they had <br />proceeded to lease land at 2526 El Camino Real for Used Car Lot, they being under <br />the impression that a use permit granted to the owner some months previously could <br />be used by them. Mr. Stevenson asked for a decision concerning their status under <br />the present ordinance outlining the difference between the used car dealer and a new <br />agency dealer. Mr. Stevenson stated they had no objections to taking out Used Car <br />Dealer License and paying the necessary license fee but his purpose in appearing <br />at this meeting was in the interest of saving time and getting into operation. <br />After further discussion, Councilman Spillers moved that this case be decided the <br />same as recent case of Menlo Motors, in other words the necessary used Car Permit <br />be enforced to cover this particular case. seconded by Councilman Royer and carried. <br />Mr. .Stevenson was advised to appear at the Planning Commission meeting the following <br />evening to apply for his use permit after which he would go through the regular <br />proceedings of cash deposit, advertising, etc. <br />CERTIFIED COPY OF SAN CARLOS' RESOLUTION REDUCING ASSESSMENTS ON CITY LOTS. City Clerk <br />Dodge read the City of San Carlos Resolution No -1951-40 deleting construction of <br />sanitary sewer laterals from the White Oaks Tract Improvement job covering all lots <br />in the City of Redwood City adjacent to this area.' Mr. Kenneth I. Jones, Jr., <br />representing Kirkbride, Wilson, addressed the Council stating that in order to clear <br />up that apparent misunderstanding concerning the proposed annexation of several lots <br />in this area and the inclusion of this area in the improvement district, he would <br />attempt to explain the matter in full and invite questions from t he members of the <br />Council. Mr. Wayne Millington representing several property owners in the unin- <br />corporated area stated his opinion why the area should not be included citing <br />several instances where total assessments against individual pieces of property were <br />from two to three times more than the assessed valuation. In his opinion the projec, <br />would benefit the City of San Carlos, at the expense of the area including the <br />Redwood City lots and the unincorporated area. Councilman Royer stated that the Cit; <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.