My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
BOOK 25_1955-08-01 to 1955-11-28 (missing 1954-02-15 to 1955-08-01)
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Minutes
>
1955 PARTIAL BOOK 25
>
BOOK 25_1955-08-01 to 1955-11-28 (missing 1954-02-15 to 1955-08-01)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/12/2017 4:56:04 PM
Creation date
10/12/2017 4:52:28 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Type
Joint
Agency Type
City Council
Date
8/1/1955
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
114
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
453 <br />A portion (531 long) is only 1-5•feet wide. The City needs a deed from Mrs. McIntyre <br />for a parcel 18.5' x 531 before all the conditions are met. The motion was dropped <br />and Councilman Spillers moved that the recommendation be held up for two weeks. seconded <br />by Councilman Stout and carried. <br />PLANNING COMMISSION REC <br />APPROVAL OF PETITION OF MARY & JESSE DAVIS TO REZONE LOTS <br />3 & 49 FINGER PARK (20 FINGER AVENUE) FROM R-1 TO R-3 DISTRICT. Councilman Stout moved <br />that the matter be set for a public hearing in two weeks (October 17th), seconded by <br />Councilman Britschgi and carried. <br />PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDED ADOPTION OF THE AMENDMENT TO ORDINANCE 600 TO ESTABLISH <br />FENCE AND HEDGE HEIGHTS. The following is the proposed fence amendment as offered by <br />,I <br />the Planning Commission: <br />PROPOSED FENCE AMENDMENT <br />15.1 D Height of Fences and Hedges <br />No fence shall hereafter be erected, moved or altered and no hedge <br />shall be grown so that: <br />1. On interior lot lines no portion of said fence or hedge shall <br />extend 6 feet in height behind the front setback line. <br />2. On the street side of any corner lote, where there is no <br />reversed frontage (key lot), no portion of any fence or hedge <br />shall exceed 6 feet in height and shall not be erected closer <br />than 30 feet from the front line of said lot, but said fence <br />i may be erected to a height of 6 feet on the property line on <br />the street side of a corner lot to the rear of the front 30 <br />feet of said lot except as provided in paragraph 3 and 4 <br />hereof. <br />3. On the street side of any corner lot, where there is reversed <br />frontage (key lot) no portion of any fence or hedge shall <br />exceed 3 feet in height unless said fence or hedge is set <br />back at least 10 feet from the side line of said lot, in <br />which case said fence or hedge shall not exceed 3 feet in <br />height any closer than 30 feet from the front line of said <br />lot. <br />' 4. On the portion of the lot between the front setback line and <br />j the street line, no portion of any fence or hedge shall <br />exceed 3 feet in height, and no fence or -hedge shall exceed <br />3 feet in height along any side lot line within 20 feet of <br />any garage driveway. <br />In lieu of a 3 foot fence adjacent to a garage driveway, a fence not <br />exceeding 6 feet may be erected provided said fence shall be erected <br />on an angle from a point 20 feet from -any garage driveway to the <br />nearest wall of any garage. <br />Councilman Spillers moved approval of the Planning Commission's recommendation and <br />introduction of ordinance, seconded by Councilman Britschgi. City Attorney Currie <br />i'. <br />stated that the Planning Commission added the last paragraph after he had checked the <br />h' <br />l <br />ordinance, and in his opinion it was not worded correctly in view of the other proposed <br />= <br />changes. The motion was corrected subject to the approval of the City Attorney and <br />° <br />carried. City Attorney Currie stated that the ordinance, when adopted, would not be <br />lretroactive. l . <br />jj <br />, <br />PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDED DENIAL OF PLANNING COMMISSION'S OWN ACTION TO INITIATE <br />REZONING OF THE AREA BOUNDED BY DUANE, WHIPPLE, EL CAMINO REAL AND BREWSTER AVENUE <br />FROM R-4 TO P-1 DISTRICT. Councilman Stout moved that the public hearing be set for <br />three weeks (October 24th), seconded by Councilman Spillers and carried. <br />PLANNING COMMISSION RECOPMENDED APPROVAL OF APPLICATION OF F. MORESCO FOR RESUBDIVISION OF <br />LOT 109 LEE TRACT, INTO TWO LOTS (162 Orchard) SUBJECT TO - <br />�i <br />1. Owner pay for sewer lateral. <br />2. Front setback to be 25 feet. <br />!I <br />it <br />i <br />Councilman Spillers moved approval of the Planning Commission's recommendation, <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.