My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
BOOK 26_1955-11-28 to 1957-06-17
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Minutes
>
1955 to 1957 Book 26
>
BOOK 26_1955-11-28 to 1957-06-17
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/16/2017 10:17:41 AM
Creation date
10/16/2017 10:00:08 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Type
Regular
Agency Type
City Council
Date
11/28/1955
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
510
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
1. <br />Later at the same meeting we were presented with a letter from the City <br />Manager indicating; that the preliminary budget for the ensuing year will be <br />in excess of two million dollars; that the financing thereof will require a <br />tax rate of x"1.3049 or some six cents in excess of the current tax rate. <br />A preemptory examination of the data submitted with said letter reveals that <br />is this revenue of +21,225 was paid into the City's treasury and could thus <br />be considered as part of available revenue the tax rate could be lowered by <br />close to 2 cents. <br />Gentlemen, I do not believe that it is proper and just that we should make <br />all taxpayers in the city pay that excess to permit the granting of this <br />special consideration to the Oddstad Homes. I do not believe that after <br />careful consideration and reflection the members of this Council would have <br />the taxpayers of this community bear the extra burden, no matter how small, <br />in order that any one may enjoy special privileges not accorded to all others <br />on an equal basis." <br />Councilman Weiss moved reconsideration of the action of the Council on the adoption of <br />said Resolution 2244. The motion lost for lack of a second. Councilman Herkner was of <br />the opinion that the City might need the money ($21,225) more next year than they would <br />this year. <br />Councilman Weymouth offered ORDINANCE 861 APPROVING THE ANNEXATION TO THE CITY OF <br />REDWOOD CITY OF CERTAIN UNINHABITED TERRITORY DESIGNATED "FARM HILL ADDITION NO. 1" <br />AND HEREIN DESCRIBED, AND HEREIN ANNEXING SAID TERRITORY TO SAID CITY OF REDWOOD CITY <br />and moved its adoption, seconded by Councilman Herkner and carried on roll call, <br />Councilman Weiss voting NO. <br />Councilman Spillers offered RESOLUTION 2258 GRANTING VARIANCE ALLOWING 5' REAR YARD SETBACK <br />TO L. ALAUX (433 Lincoln Avenue) and moved its adoption, seconded by Councilman Wey- <br />mouth and carried on roll call, Councilman Stout voting NO' <br />Councilman Spillers offered RESOLUTION 2259 REQUIRING ASSUM?TION OF BONDED INDEBTEDNESS AND <br />WAIVING PROVISIONS OF' RESOLUTION NO. 1979 IN CONNECTION WITH PROPOSED ANNEXATION OF <br />HIGHLANDS TERRITORY NO. 7 and moved its adoption, seconded by Councilman Weiss on the <br />basis that the annexation fee must be collected in uninhabited areas in the future. <br />Councilman Herlmer raised the question as to why they were not considering the <br />annexation fees when it was the previous opinion of the Council that they should collect <br />the fee to pay for the benefits they receive. This was followed by discussion in which <br />the Mayor stated that they did not consider collecting the fee in this particular <br />case because of the difficulty in collecting the money. A good deal of the property <br />j in -the area is unimproved and the property owners are scattered and the possibility of <br />. collecting the 075.00 per lot from everyone would be almost impossible. The people who <br />did not want the annexation would not pay the.$75.00. In the other case, the property <br />that is, to be annexed is owned by one owner and there is no problem in collecting the <br />money. The City Attorney raised the question in regard to circulating a petition for <br />improvements the same time the petition for annexation is being circulated. This was <br />folicw ed by discussion. Councilman Stout asked that the minutes show the statements <br />made in regard to why the annexation fees were being waived in this case so the Council <br />would riot be setting a precedent. Councilman Weiss spoke in regard to the possibility <br />i <br />of the City giving their approval of their intent to allow sewer and water improvements <br />at a later date so the people would know for sure whether or not the Council would look <br />in favor of improvements in the event the area is annexed. The motion carried on roll <br />call. <br />Councilman Weiss moved that the City Attorney be advised when he submits the form for <br />annexation that he also provide for the forms for the circulation of petitions for <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.