Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> ~ <br /> <br /> ~ Future traffic volumes from a roved but not et constructed develo ments to be rovided bY ci <br /> pP ~ Y ) P , P tY <br /> ~ staff, will be estimated and assigned to the roadway network. Level of service calcuiations will be <br /> conducted to evaluate intersection operations under Background Conditions. Planned and funded <br /> intersection and roadway improvements expected to be in place by the projecYs opening date will be <br /> included in this analysis. <br /> ~ Task Evaluate Project Conditions <br /> <br /> ~ The project trips estimated in Task 1(or 1A) will be added to the background traffic volumes <br /> developed in Task 3 to represent Project Conditions. Intersection level of service calculations will be <br /> conducted to estimate the operating levels of the study intersections during the AM and PM peak <br /> hours under Project Conditions. Consistent with previous EIR traffic studies, freeway operations will <br /> ~ be analyzed in terms of changes to volumes under this scenario. <br /> <br /> As part of this task, we will also evaluate how implementation of the project will affect bicycle, <br /> ~ pedestrian, and transit facilities and services. This evaluation will include a review of on-site and off- <br /> site pedestrian connections and potential circulation hazards for all users. <br /> Task Identify Significant Impacts and Recommend Mitigation Measures <br /> The impacts of the proposed project on the surrounding roadway system will be identified by <br /> ~ comparing the results of the level of service calculations for Background Conditions to the results for <br /> Project Conditions. <br /> For significant impacts, feasible mitigation measures will be recommended to reduce impacts to a <br /> less than significant level where possible. Measures could include physical improvements (such as <br /> adding turn lanes, installing traffic signals, or restricting turning movements), as well as methods to <br /> modify the traffic demand of the project such as reducing the size of the project, enhancing facilities <br /> for alternative modes, and instituting Transportation Demand Management (TDM) measures (see <br /> Task 6 for additional discussion of TDM measures). <br /> Fehr & Peers will calculate the projecYs impact fee for each development alternative based on the <br /> Citys fee schedule. Additional contributions may be required for improvements not included in the <br /> City's fee program related to emergency vehicle access and other circulation impacts. <br /> Project impacts to the surrounding transit, bicycle, pedestrian facilities and parking will be identified. <br /> Measures to mitigate project impacts on these facilities will be recommended including providing <br /> linkages to adjacent land uses and improving facilities for bicycling commuters. <br /> Task C/CAG and TDM Analysis <br /> The proposed project will generate substantially more than trips during the peak hour and will <br /> require mitigation per San Mateo City/County Association of Governments (C/CAG) guidelines. The <br /> CMP facilities in the study area include I-280, SR (EI Camino Real), and US Measures to <br /> mitigate project impacts will be identified from the information contained in the C/CAG Land Use <br /> Impact Analysis Program dated October This document includes a list of potential TDM <br /> measures designed to reduce the number of single-occupant vehicle trips generated by uses similar <br /> to those proposed for the project. TDM measures include, but are not limited to, vanpool/carpools, <br /> parking cash-out programs, inclusion of on-site amenities (e.g., dry cleaning service, ATM, <br /> cafeteria/restaurant, fitness center, etc.), video-conferencing centers, TDM coordinators, and transit <br /> information and pass subsidies. A comprehensive list to mitigate impacts to the CMP facilities will <br /> be prepared. <br /> An alternative mode enhancement that will be considered includes shuttle service to Caltrain. Fehr