Agmt01 Wagstaff and Associates - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

Wagstaff and Associates Contract Exhibit "A" City of Redwood City Bair Island Road Development EIR October 25, 2001 Page 11--26 r C. Mitigated Development Program (design alternative incorporating all land use, visual/ r urban design, transportation/circulation/parking, biological resources and hydrologic mitigations r identified under Tasks III. A through IILK (specific impact analysis) and Task IV (Relationship r to Adopted Plans and Policies) r D. Reduced Development Program--Reconfigured (reduced number of residential units-- r perhaps 1,000--and modifications to building array with reduced building heights) r E. Revised Land Use Mix (less residential/more office-commercial) r F. Revised Circulation Layout r (1) Qualitative Analysis of Four Alternatives. For four of the six alternatives, a qualitative, r summary evaluation of the comparative impacts and mitigating characteristics of each will be r provided, along with a graphic prepared by the EIR urban designer illustrating each alternative r as appropriate. For example, trip generation estimates will be prepared for each of these four r alternatives, and will be used to qualitatively discuss their traffic impact implications in r comparison relative to the proposed projects. No detailed LOS analysis will be completed for r these four alternatives. r For two of the six alternatives a more detailed comparison will be provided, including r comparative traffic (LOS) impacts for selected .key facilities (see Task III.D.6 herein), and r comparative visual simulations (see Task III.C.4 herein). r (2) More Detailed Analysis of Two Alternatives. Two of the six altematives, probably C and r D, will be described and analyzed in more detail, in anticipation of possible adoption as the r preferred project. The more detailed description and impact evaluations will be designed to r provide adequate CEQA documentation in the event that one of these two alternatives is r ultimately selected by the applicant and/or City. As indicated in this proposal under Tasks r III.B.6 (page 11-8), III.D.6 (page 11-14), III.E.3 (page 11-16), and III.F.4 (page 11-19), Wagstaff and r Associates and the EIR urban design, visual simulation consultant, traffic consultant, biological r resources consultant, hydrologist and biological resources consultant will prepare more r detailed impact and mitigation comparisons for these two more detailed alternatives, and will r identify any specific changes in impact and/or mitigation findings and/or any additional impacts r or mitigations. r (3/ Identification of Environmentally Superior Alternative. As required under section 15126.6(e)(1) of the CEQA Guidelines, Wagstaff and Associates will identify the environmentally superior alternative or alternatives other than the "no project" alternative. A discussion of alternative sites will also be included if appropriate, as provided under CEQA Guidelines section 15126.6(f)(2). WP51~622iMISCiOO13-2. EXA