Laserfiche WebLink
because of the slope density, than almost any other lot on the street. The main goal of <br /> the lot line adjustment was to improve the slope densiW calculation so that a larger <br /> structure could be built. I believe this is another intentional misreprentation by Mr. <br /> Farahyar and his archetech in order to get this development finished for the maximum <br /> possible financial return regardless of social norms, the neighborhood, and <br /> government regulations. According to the Code: <br /> <br /> 45.8 Architectural Standards <br /> B. The size and design of the structure shall be considered for the purpose of <br /> determining that the structure is in proportion to its building site and that it <br /> has a balance and unity among its external features so as to present a harmonious <br /> appearance; <br /> C. The extent to which the structure conforms to the general character of <br /> other structures in the vicinity insofar as the character can be ascertained and is <br /> found to be architecturally desirable; <br /> <br />I believe the architect intentionally mislead the Zoning Administrator to cimumvent the <br />Zoning Code regulations. <br /> <br />It is my belief that Mr. Farahyar does not intend to establish long term residence at 747 <br />Southview Way and that this development is an attempt to get the maximum financial <br />return at any cost to the neighborhood or the surrounding neighbors. He is oblivious to <br />the concerns of local residents; is willing to breach agreements with them. I am <br />concerned about being involved in this issue with an individual who I feel has such lit'de <br />regard for social contract, the environment, or respect for his neighbors. <br /> <br />Sincerely, <br /> <br />Da~uthview Way <br /> <br /> <br />