CC Min 1985-09-23 - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

Item No. 3 (continued) City Attorney Schricker recommended that the 3rd sentence of Condition No. 3 should read, "This transportation study will be the basis for the implementation of any further Transportation Systems Management measures by the City of Redwood City and for the implementation of any physical modifications in Marine World Parkway, Shore way Road, or the Ralston Interchange ", with the addition of the following clause: "including access thereto as revised by the addendum, approved by Resolution No. 10013 adopted September 23, 1985, to that certain agreement dated August 28, 1968, between the cities of Belmont and Redwood City pertaining to Ralston Interchange access." He recommended further that, with the modification to Condition No. 3 as indicated above, all other action by the Planning Commission be affirmed on the appeal. Mr. Adams concurred in the recommended change. Kenneth Dickerson, City Attorney, City of Belmont, having been advised in response to question to City Attorney Schricker that the City of Belmont and Kumam could build the access shown on Exhibit A to the Amendment to the Agreement, stated that the City of Belmont withdraws its appeal. M /S: Claire /Mosher to grant the appeals with respect to the modification of Condition No. 3 attached to approval of the Tentative Map for Marine World Executive Park, as indicated, and to affirm the action of the Planning Commission in all other respects. Carried by unanimous roll call vote. MINUTE ORDER NO. 85 -145 4. Appeal of decision of Zoning Administrator to grant a Use Permit and Architectural Permit to construct a Mini - Warehouse and caretaker's residence at 145 Monroe Street (Louis Bandov, appellant) (203 -02) Report of City Manager and Community Development Director 9/19/85 Community Development Director Schroeter summarized the report and replied to questions by Council. Mayor Britschgi invited the appellant or his representative to speak. No one for the appellant responded. Michael Garrity, 981 E1 Cajon Drive, Danville, attorney representing Storage Services, the applicant for the Use Permit and Architectural Permit, indicated that he had arranged to have the neighbors of the proposed project contacted to determine how they felt about it, and found no opposition. He stated that he had been notified of the meeting. Ameen Noshy, architect, 1700 Broadway, Oakland 94612, stated he is associated with the architect for the project. MINUTE BOOK NO. 46 Page 52 Reg. Mtg 9/23/85 Page 3