CC Min 1984-06-25 - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

Item No. 2 (continued) Anthony Lauricella, 242 Upland Road, objected to the removal of a home where the parking lot is to be constructed and the effect of the proposed structure on his view. Susan Wharton, 112 Circle, reported making a survey which indicates that more than the 23 employees mentioned by the Clinic as regularly parking in the neighborhood_ appeared to be parking on the streets and stated she does not believe the parking structure will relieve the problem. Dave Rusconi, 260 Upland Road, suggested that the Clinic will expand so that the increased parking represented by the new structure will not be adequate and urged Council to reverse the decision of the Zoning Administrator. Vice Mayor Mosher invited anyone else who wished to do so to speak. No one wished to speak. M /S: Stangel /Bury to close the public hearing. Carried unanimously by voice vote and public hearing closed at 9:45 p.m. In response to question as to why the traffic study was not made a condition before completion of the parking structure, Mr. Patterson said that the requirement is for "after six months ", since the Zoning Administrator believes it will alleviate the present on- street parking and traffic problems in the neighborhood. In response to question, Mr. Hallum agreed that the Clinic would require use of an identifying sticker for the automobiles used by all Clinic employees and doctors. M /S: Chandler / Stangel to deny the appeal of Oak Knoll Manor Neighborhood Association from the determination of the Zoning Administrator to grant a Use Permit to Redwood Medical Clinic to allow parking on residentially zoned lots at 245 and 251 Upland Road, based on the following findings in response to the appeal: 1: That with regard to the drainage system, the first condition of the Use Permit requires that the adequacy of the drainage system is subject to the sound determination of the Director of Public Works with due regard to the drainage system overall; 2. That Condition 2. requiring a traffic engineer, in cooperation with the City Traffic Engineer, to submit a report analyzing parking characteristics in order to ascertain that the off-street parking on Clinic property does serve Clinic needs is appropriate in that the facilities are being constructed to address the present on- street parking problem and that the provision for a study following construction addresses any residential problem which may occur after the fact; 3. That Condition 3. is not vague in that it specifies a masonry wall along the Upland Road frontage is required and that other requirements are not specific because landscaping plans are to be submitted; Reg.Mtg. 6/25/84 Page 4 MINUTE BOOK NO. 45 Page No. 72