My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
Agmt89 Chem Risk
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Agreements
>
1980-1989
>
1989
>
Agmt89 Chem Risk
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/5/2005 2:53:29 PM
Creation date
6/13/2002 9:22:55 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Agreement
Contractor Name
Chem Risk
PROJECT NAME
health risk assessment for Westport project
RMP File Number
304
Date
7/11/1989
Reso Ref
11005 11077
MO Ref
89-131
Box
2772
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
15
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
that may eventually review the completed health risk assessment. <br />Therefore, the consultant shall assist the City by resubmiting the <br />revised work program to the review agencies to obtain their <br />concurrence. The City will request a written statement of <br />concurrence from each review agency, but will not hold the <br />consultant responsible for lack of agency response to such requests. <br />Following review by regulatory agencies, the work program will be <br />submitted for review and acceptance by the City Planning <br />Commission and/or City Council. The consultant shall be responsible <br />for presenting and discussing the work program at hearings and <br />meetings with the above-mentioned agencies, and the City Planning <br />Commission and Council. <br /> <br />The presentation to the City Planning Commission and Council is to <br />include discussion of what the health risk assessment will address <br />and how the results will be documented and presented to decision <br />makers. This project is the first introduction of a risk assessment to <br />these local officials, and they will eventually be basing approval or <br />denial of the project partly on their understanding of the results of <br />these studies. They will seek an .understanding of what the <br />quantitative conclusions of a health risk assessment mean, and what <br />level of risk might be acceptable. The consultant is to discuss these <br />topics, and discuss whether achievement of "zero risk" is possible, <br />given the specific design of the project and the nature of health risk <br />assessment calculations and conclusions. <br /> <br /> It should be noted that the City Council, in upholding the certification <br /> of the FEIR and requiring a supplementary CEQA document, <br /> purposefully included language that allows the document to also <br /> include evaluation of non-health related issues. These meetings, as <br /> well as input from City staff, should be used to determine any other <br /> environmental issues to be addressed by the consultant in the CEQA <br /> document that were not addressed in the certified FEIR. These issues <br /> might arise due to new information brought forth by the project <br /> applicant in their submittal of the specific site plan. If these meetings <br /> should significantly change the scope of work of the required studies, <br /> the consultant should describe such changes and formally request <br /> any necessary adjustment of the schedule and/or budget. <br /> <br /> Page 3 of 6 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.