Laserfiche WebLink
<br />City of Redwood City Tra-- Mitigation Fee Study-Phase 11 <br />Proposal- January 11, 1999 <br /> <br />V.2 ReviewlRefine Traffic Projections <br /> <br />We propose that the traffic analysis use both intersection and link traffic volumes to identify future <br />traffic impacts. We will project future intersection turning movements at up to 25 intersections where <br />traffic counts are available, and project link volumes at up to 15 locations where 24-hour counts are <br />available. <br /> <br />V.3 Conduct Traffic Analysis <br /> <br />Using the traffic projections developed and refined in Task V.2 we will analyze future level of <br />service and identify impacts based on standards adopted in earlier tasks. The analysis will <br />differentiate between impacts caused by Redwood City development and regional or through traffic <br />growth. This differentiation will be determined using "select link" capabilities of the C/CAG traffic <br />model. As a result, we will identify the specific incremental impacts of Redwood City growth on <br />intersection and roadway service levels. We propose to utilize micro-simulation (CORSIM) analysis <br />on up to three complex situations (e.g. close proximity intersections, multi-leg intersections, etc.). <br />Use ofthe micro-simulation model will be determined on a case-by-case evaluation. <br /> <br />V.4 Develop Mitigation Measures <br /> <br />The traffic analysis will identify areas and facilities impacted in Redwood City, and determine the <br />traffic contributed to the facility by existing traffic, Redwood City growth, regional growth and <br />through traffic growth. We will develop capital improvements to mitigate existing deficiencies and <br />impacts caused by growth. To the extent feasible, the mitigation of existing deficiences will be the <br />first stage of a staged improvement plan to mitigate growth, thus minimizing temporary solutions. <br /> <br />We will prepare concept plans of mitigations (see Task VI) and present a list of preliminary capital <br />projects to the City Council (not a workshop). We will document the traffic analysis, findings and <br />capital improvement recommendations in a working paper. This task includes a meeting with City <br />staff to present and discuss the working paper prior to presentation to the City Council. After <br />receiving direction from the City Council and staff, we will refine and finalize the list of capital <br />improvements. <br /> <br />Task VI. Engineering Concepts and Cost Estimates <br /> <br />VI.l Data Collection <br /> <br />The consultant team will gather relevant data, and review and develop base maps and initial <br />improvement concepts. We will obtain and review available material for capital improvement <br />projects, including "as-builts", existing right-of-way maps, environmental documents, air photos, <br />survey controls, utilities, etc. If necessary, we will create an inventory listing of additional <br />information needed to complete the design. If necessary, we will obtain appropriate Caltrans right <br />of way record mapping, Caltrans record drawings of state facilities, other Caltrans and City as-built <br />information, adjacent land owner's plans, and other appropriate information as the basis for and to <br />initiate mapping. We will obtain mapping of major utilities from appropriate utility companies. <br /> <br />Fehr & Peers Associates, Inc. <br /> <br />Page 7 <br /> <br />..._"_.'d"____'..-"'-".."'...'..- .....--.-. <br />