Laserfiche WebLink
<br />g8-~' <br /> <br />RECOMMENDED GUIDELINES FOR THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE LAND USE <br />IMPACT ANALYSIS C MPONENT OF THE 1999 CONG TION MANAGEMENT . <br />PROGRAM <br /> <br />AII land use changes or new developments that are projected to generate a net (subtracting <br />existing uses that are c\UTently active) 100 or more trips per hour at any time during the a.m. <br />or p.m. peak period, should be reported to C/CAG within ten days of completion of the initial <br />study prepared under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). Peak period includes <br />6:00 a.m. to 10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. to 7:00 p.m. Although projects that generate less than <br />100 peak hour trips are not subject to these guidelines, local jurisdictions are strongly <br />encouraged to apply them to all projects, particularly where the jurisdiction has determined <br />that the impacts of the project will have an adverse effect on traffic in that jurisdiction. <br /> <br />Local jurisdictions must ensure that the developer and! or tenants will mitigate all new peak <br />hour trips (including the first 100 trips) projected to be generated by the development. The <br />local jurisdiction can select one or more of the options that foIIow or may propose other <br />methods for mitigating the trips. It is up to the local jurisdiction working together with the <br />project sponsor to chose the methods that will be compatible with the intended purpose of the <br />project and the community which it will serve. The options identified in these guidelines are <br />not intended to limit choices. Loca1 jurisdictions are encouraged to be creative in developing <br />options that meet local needs while accomplishing the goal of mitigating new peak hour trips. <br />The additional measures that are not specifically included in these guidelines should be offered <br />for review by C/CAG staff in advance of approving the project. Appeals to the decisions by <br />C/CAG staff will be taken to the full C/CAG Board for consideration. Some of the choices for <br />local jurisdictions include: . <br /> <br />1. <br />2. <br /> <br />Reduce the scope of the project so that it will generate less than 100 net peak hour, trips. <br />Build adequate roadway and/or. transit improvements so that the added peak hour. trips <br />will have no measurable impact on the Congestion Management Program roadway <br />network. This means that 100% of the impact of the new trips will be mitigated.' <br />If a local jurisdiction currently coIIects traffic mitigation fees, any portion of thé fees that <br />are used to mitigate the impacts of the project's traffic on the Congestion Management <br />Program roadway network will count as a credit toward the mitigations required under <br />the Congestion Management Program. The developer may also contribute a one-time <br />only payment of $20,000 per peak hour trip (including the fll'St 100 trips) to a special <br />fund for the implementation of appropriate transportation demand management system <br />measures at that development These funds will be used to implement transportation <br />demand management programs that serve the development making the contribution. <br />Require the developer and all subsequent tenants to implement Transportation Demand <br />Management programs that have the capacitv to fully mitigate the new peak ham trips. <br />The developer/tenants will not be held responsible for the extent to which these programs <br />are actually used. The following is a list of acceptable programs and the equivalent <br />number of trips that are mitigated. Programs can be mixed and matched so long as the <br />total mitigated trips is equal to or greater than the new peak hour trips generated by the <br />project. These programs, once implemented, must be on-going for the occupied life of the <br /> <br />3. <br /> <br />4. <br />