AgdaPkt 2000-06-12 - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

9 F-5" be prepared and approved prior to use of the existing building as a church. Zone Ord. Section 28.5 provides, in pertinent part: "Prior to any development within the RSB District, a Specific Plan shall be prepared as set forth under California law (Gov. Code § 65451) to provide a greater level of specificity in the planning of sites and also to show the scale and relationships of the uses and/or structures. ..." RSOA contended that use of an existing building as a church constituted a "development" requiring preparation of a Specific Plan under said Section 28.5. The Zoning administrator and the Church contended that use of an existing building with minor improvements to a parking lot, removal of small existing structures and relocation of a trailer to obscure it from public view, did not constitute a "development" requiring preparation of a Specific Plan. 3) On March 13, the Council of the City of Redwood City heard the appeal. Having heard all interested parties wishing to testify at the hearing, the Council closed the public hearing. Following further discussions with representatives of the Church and RSOA, the Council continued the matter for sixty (60) days to provide opportunity for the RSOA and the Church to explore the possibility of reaching a compromise. During the intervening period, representatives of the Church, RSOA, and SBSA met and conferred regarding matters of mutual interest pertaining to future development and land uses in the RSB Zoning District. As a result of those meetings, the Church, RSOA, and SBSA entered the MOU which, among other matters, includes a compromise between RSOA and the Church regarding the above-mentioned appeal. At the request of those parties, this revised Use Permit includes provisions agreed upon among them. Accordingly, the issue on appeal, viz., whether a Specific Plan would be required for the use proposed by the Church was not determined. 4) By letter dated ..ÃJ,..,~ 7. , 2000, RSOA advised the City Council that it would withdraw its appeal upon the issuance of a revised use permit for the Church's use of the Property in the exact form as attached to that letter. This Temporary Use Permit is identical to the form included with RSOA's JvNe..'-¡ , 2000 letter and, therefore, RSOA's appeal is deemed withdrawn. On JVAI~ 1.;2. ,2000, the City Council, by motion duly made and carried, terminated the appeal proceedings. Permission is hereby granted to the Church to conduct and operate a church facility on the Property subject to the following conditions: Conditions 1. The Church, or its designee, shall prepare a Specific Plan showing all existing and proposed new development as outlined in the MOU ("MOU Specific Plan"). In the event a Specific Plan is not prepared, this Temporary Use Permit shall expire and terminate as provided in Condition 22, below. Upon application of the Church, a subsequent Use Fullyalive-rsoa f/sh/sh/RC/ComDev 06/01/00 .-.-." "--"T