Laserfiche WebLink
<br />~~ - \~ <br /> <br />combined parcels, particularly within the "PO" (Professional Office), "CA" (Central <br /> <br />Administrative), "CN" (Neighborhood Commercial), "CB" (Central Business), "CG" <br />(General Commercial), "IR" (Industrial-Restricted), "IP" (Industrial Park), and <br /> <br />"CBR" (Central Business Retail) Zoning Districts; <br /> <br />C. Such relatively large-scale office development proposals, if allowed to <br /> <br />proceed to construction, would create structures disproportionate to, and in <br /> <br />conflict with the appearance of, existing structures adjacent to or in the vicinity <br /> <br />thereof; <br /> <br />D. <br /> <br />Such office development proposals, if allowed to proceed to <br /> <br />construction, would use land resources which could otherwise be developed for <br /> <br />housing, commercial, and other uses compatible with, and supportive of existing <br /> <br />uses, including residential uses; <br /> <br />E. The unavailability of housing in the City of Redwood City is critical and <br /> <br />the housing shortage has adversely affected economic and social resources of <br /> <br />the City, including businesses, schools, colleges, and professions; <br /> <br />F. If the trend of office development were allowed to continue, critically <br /> <br />necessary housil1'Q, commercial, and other-use sites will be eliminated, thereby <br /> <br />exacerbating the housing shortage and the adverse economic and social <br /> <br />conditions; <br /> <br />G. <br /> <br />If the office development proposals were allowed to proceed to <br /> <br />construction under current zoning district classifications and related regulations, <br /> <br />severe traffic congestion and parking shortages would result, thereby burdening <br /> <br />Ord-116 <br />F:/shared/redwood/council <br />DES:rg <br />09/06/00 <br /> <br />2 <br />