Laserfiche WebLink
<br />new studies and provide an assessment of the probable short- and long-term cumulative <br />impacts of the project. In addition, the draft and final EIR shall provide an evaluation of <br />all feasible mitigation measures, which could be carried out to reduce or eliminate <br />adverse impacts of the proposed project. The EIR, where appropriate and as directed by <br />City staff, shall also analyze all feasible alternatives to the project as proposed. The EIR <br />will be prepared in a format acceptable to the city of Redwood City and will include the <br />following sections: <br /> <br />1.0 <br /> <br />Table of Contents <br />Executive Summary.. This section provides an overview of the proposed project, including a list <br />of required discretionary approvals. The summary will also include a summary of impacts and <br />mitigation measures, known areas of controversy including issues raised by agencies and the <br />public, as well as a summary of alternatives to the proposed project. <br />Introduction - The introduction will define the purpose, scope and legislative authority of the <br />EIR, requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and other pertinent <br />environmental rules and regulations. This section will also describe the EIR process, structure, <br />required contents and its relationship to other potential responsible or trustee agencies. <br />Environmental Setting - The environmental setting will provide a description of the existing site <br />conditions, An overview of the local and regional environmental setting of the project will also be <br />provided in accordance with CEQA Guidelines Section 15125, <br />Project Description - This section will provide the project location within the regional context <br />and a description of the project including proposed land uses, circulation, and phasing. An <br />overview of the project's background and objectives will also be provided, and the required <br />discretionary permits and approvals will be listed, <br />Environmental Impact Analysis -This section is the "meat" of the EIR, It will include a <br />discussion of Existing Conditions, Thresholds of Significance, Impacts, Level of Significance <br />Prior to Mitigation, Mitigation Measures, and Analysis of Significance After Mitigation for each <br />environmental issue area, <br />Cumulative Impacts - The EIR will include a discussion of potential cumulative impacts, <br />Cumulative impacts are defined as those which by themselves may not result in significant <br />impacts, but when combined with similar impacts from existing, approved but not yet built or <br />planned projects could be cumulatively considerable in their environmental effects, and therefore, <br />potentially significant. DEA will review projects in the city of Redwood City to develop the <br />related projects list. <br />Growth Inducement - The Growth Inducement section will focus on the potential of the <br />proposed project to induce economic or population growth and the construction of additional <br />housing, either directly or indirectly, in the surrounding environment. The potential for the use of <br />large amounts offuel or energy will be discussed, <br />Significant Irreversible Environmental Changes - This section will include CEQA required <br />analyses of Significant Irreversible Environmental Changes Resultingfrom Project Implementation, <br />Effects Found Not To Be Significant - This section will evaluate environmental effects found not <br />to be significant as part ofthe EIR process and during the initial study process. <br />Alternatives - The Alternatives section of the EIR will be based on a description of "reasonable" <br />project alternatives, defined in consultation with City staff, which reduce or avoid potentially <br />significant impacts associated with the proposed project. Site-specific alternatives, if needed, will <br />be developed in response to the findings of the environmental analyses and the various technical <br />studies and may include alternative project design to mitigate one or more of the identified <br />significant adverse impacts of the proposed project. This may include a revised site plan or other <br />feasible development scenarios for the site. The No Project alternative is required by CEQA and <br />will evaluate no new development on the project site. The advantages and disadvantages of each <br />alternative will be compared to the proposed project and reasons for rejecting or recommending <br />the alternative will be discussed in the EIR. <br />References, Persons and Agencies Contacted and EIR Preparation <br />List of Preparers/Or2anizations Consulted <br /> <br />2.0 <br /> <br />3.0 <br /> <br />4.0 <br /> <br />5.0 <br /> <br />6.0 <br /> <br />7.0 <br /> <br />8.0 <br /> <br />9.0 <br /> <br />10.0 <br /> <br />11.0 <br />12.0 <br /> <br />',""""'-"'--Y---"""-' <br />