My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
AgdaPkt 2017-12-04 Joint SA PFA
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Agenda Packets
>
2010-2019
>
2017
>
AgdaPkt 2017-12-04 Joint SA PFA
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/19/2017 8:54:28 AM
Creation date
11/30/2017 4:16:55 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Agenda Packet
Meeting Type
Joint
Agency Type
City Council and Successor Agency and Public Financing Authority
Date
12/4/2017
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
399
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
8.C. - Page 4 <br />E. When a member completes a term without being reappointed to the succeeding <br />term, including instances in which a member is not reappointed because they <br />would exceed the term limit, such member shall continue to serve until a <br />successor is appointed and qualified. <br />3) Citv Manager Local Residencv Requirement <br />The Committee recommends amending Section 26 (City Manager). This amendment <br />deletes the local residency requirement for the City Manager in order to comply with <br />State law. Section 26 of the Charter currently states that if the City Manager is not a <br />resident of the City at the time of appointment, he/she shall become and remain a <br />resident of the City promptly after appointment. Section 26 was last amended in 1936. <br />In 1976, Article XI, Section 10 of the California Constitution was amended to prohibit <br />cities from requiring that employees be residents. The proposed amendments conform <br />the Charter to this Constitutional requirement by deleting the residency requirement in <br />Section 26. <br />4) Budget Procedures <br />The Committee recommends amendments to Section 51 (Budget) and Section 51.5 <br />(Adoption of Budget). These proposed amendments reduce the administrative steps <br />required to adopt the annual budget while preserving the same level of transparency <br />and public input. Currently, Section 51 requires the Council to establish, by motion, the <br />date on which the City Manager will submit the budget to the Council for review. The <br />proposed amendments eliminate the need for the Council to take this procedural action <br />and replace it with a requirement that the City Manager submit the budget at least 30 <br />days before the new fiscal year begins. Section 51.5 contains a similar procedural <br />requirement that the budget be adopted by resolution upon a date established by <br />resolution of the Council. The proposed amendments remove this requirement for two <br />separate resolutions and simply require that the budget be adopted by resolution after <br />conclusion of the public hearing. <br />Together, these amendments remove non -substantive procedural steps associated with <br />budget adoption. They do not alter the substantive information required to be included in <br />the budget, nor do they change the general requirement to make copies of the budget <br />available for inspection by the public or the requirement to hold a public hearing on the <br />budget. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.