My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
AgdaPkt 2017-12-04 Joint SA PFA
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Agenda Packets
>
2010-2019
>
2017
>
AgdaPkt 2017-12-04 Joint SA PFA
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/19/2017 8:54:28 AM
Creation date
11/30/2017 4:16:55 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Agenda Packet
Meeting Type
Joint
Agency Type
City Council and Successor Agency and Public Financing Authority
Date
12/4/2017
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
399
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
8.B. - Page 13 <br />did not intend to propose height increases as part of this planning process, however <br />consolidating zoning districts using the existing mixed-use zoning districts may be one <br />solution to meeting the original goals of the mixed-use district. This could result in <br />modest height increases, when benefiting the overall community. Alternatively, a zoning <br />amendment could be made that affects uses, but not other development standards. <br />Below are options for consideration: <br />1. Rezone MULW to Mixed -Use Corridor (MUC) or Mixed -Use Neighborhood <br />(MUN) based on existing context and surrounding uses. In areas closer to <br />residential uses, MUN may be more appropriate, which has lower height for <br />commercial uses and lower FAR for all uses. In areas closer to Downtown or <br />commercial uses, MUC may be a better fit, which would increase the height by <br />one story and 10-20' depending on the use, but would decrease the FAR for all <br />uses. With this option, the City could create an overlay or sub -district to allow and <br />incentivize live/work units. <br />2. Maintain MULW but amend the development standards to increase flexibility in <br />uses. With this option, the City could maintain the existing height provisions of <br />three stories, but incorporate the community benefit bonus height provisions, <br />consistent with the other mixed-use zoning districts. A bonus height increase <br />could also be considered for specific community benefits. Staff have received <br />feedback from applicants proposing projects within the MULW zoning districts <br />who could provide greater community benefits if there were incentives put in <br />place. We have heard similar feedback from residents involved in the <br />development review process. <br />Unless the Council has specific direction, staff recommends further study and public <br />input of these options during implementation of the Plan. This process could include a <br />study session before the Council if so desired. <br />Place -Making. Similar to the CAG's list of priorities, aesthetics is a critical element that <br />improves the experience for all users and modes of transit. Whether driving, bicycling, <br />walking, or taking transit, people would benefit from cleaner sidewalks, improved <br />building facades, public art, and more greenery and open space. The goal is to <br />establish a sense of pride and identity for EI Camino Real that is distinctive from the <br />Downtown. Aesthetics and branding will let people know that they have arrived when <br />driving through Redwood City. Strategies include a banner program, facade <br />improvement program, mural and public art strategies specific to EI Camino Real, new <br />median trees, and opportunities for stormwater treatment landscaping along the <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.