My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
CC Min 2005-08-08
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Minutes
>
2000-2009
>
2005
>
CC Min 2005-08-08
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/8/2017 1:03:03 PM
Creation date
9/7/2005 11:40:04 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Minutes
Date
8/8/2005
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
8
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
safety; great plan and preservation of historical buildings and arts district; and <br />the need to be proactive rather than reactive in planning. <br />Public Comment: <br />Joe LaClair supported many points of the plan and stated his understanding of <br />the difficulty in providing for open space in the downtown although the plaza will <br />be an addition. If looking at 3,600 housing units in the future, some most likely <br />will include families. He stated that the small plaza adjacent to Sequoia Station <br />has a creek passing through it that is used by high school students and others <br />indicating that youth need such areas. At Veterans Boulevard there is a section <br />of Redwood Creek that, comes across and is, banked by some green space that <br />could be explored as an opportunity site without sacrificing dense building <br />opportunities downtown. <br />Adrian Brandt stated that banks should be located on side streets rather than <br />Broadway due to lack of activity on weekends and evenings: He questioned the <br />yellow triangle area where the Mexican restaurant and yogurt shop are located <br />and how. it all gets tied together to the downtown. <br />Recess: 9:35 -9.50 p.m. <br />Michael Freedman introduced the topic of physical design. Marta Borzani of the <br />Concord Group summarized the analysis of -identifying the required density so <br />that future residential development does not require City subsidy. (PowerPoint <br />Presentation on file.) Freedman stated that any questions or follow -up items may <br />be directed. through City staff so that at study session #3, the discussion would <br />begin with the issues of design and height; and address any questions or <br />concerns. (613) <br />MIS Bain/Pierce to extend the meeting until 11:15 p.m. The motion- passed by a <br />unanimous voice vote. <br />MIS Howard/Hartnett to adjourn the joint study session to the regular Council meeting. <br />The motion passed by a unanimous voice vote. <br />T. MATTERS OF COUNCIL. INTEREST <br />A. Legislation (information only) — This sub - section involves possible discussion <br />of City Position on Proposed Legislation described in the League of California <br />Cities Priority Focus Bulletin No. 29 -2005 and 30 -2005. Council may direct staff <br />to act on positions taken by Council. (Copies' of League of California Cities <br />Priority Focus available in City Clerk's Department). <br />JOINT MEETING MINUTES 'August 8, 2005 <br />CITY COUNCIL AND REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY PAGE 6 <br />SPECIAL JOINT STUDY SESSION WITH PLANNING COMMISSION <br />AND ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMITTEE <br />MINUTE ORDER BOOK 60 <br />Page No. 555 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.