Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />for the dep~rtment -time and money savers in the long run; concern <br />was expressed over the fact that the same quality of maintenance. <br />should be evidenced througho.ut the ci ty ,- and the stres s for beauty <br />for Shores is being expected without providing sufficient working <br />personnel or corresponding funds; it was suggested that there be a <br />stipulation re all new Shores plans - that maintenance costs and <br />number of man hours be determined at planning stage, by Plannmng <br />Department and Council, and that additional adequate personnel be <br />provided as each new area is accepted by the city for maintenance, <br />that it was felt it was urgent to request 11 additional personnel <br />for the Park Department by January 1st. <br /> <br />commissioner Morgan, seconded by Commissioner Schenck, moved to <br />accept the report of the Budget Sub-Committee, motion passed, <br />Commissioner Whitmore being noted absent. <br /> <br />Mr. Ullrich said 11 men for the Park Department would cost about <br />$110,000 for salaries, plus 2~~ benefits, that reserve fund of <br />$200, 000 presently has $160, 000 left in it -and this has 'to do for <br />all unanticipated needs - and the present budget would not have <br />enough money for 11 additional men for the park department. <br /> <br />Commissioner Thompson moved to recommend that a letter be written <br />to the City Manager, for the Council, outlining the critical needs <br />for additional Park Department working personnel to care for present <br />park and recreation areas, landscaped parkways, other landscape areas <br />and facilities, plus proportionate allocation of funds for vehicle <br />expense,. special departmental supplies, contractual services, and <br />so forth, and to request that urgent consideration be given to the <br />providing of eleven (11) additional men to the Park Department by <br />January 1, 1970, seconded by Commissioner Morgan, and passed, Comm- <br />issioner Stuart voting no, and Commissioner Whitmore being noted absent. <br /> <br />10 - INSTANT PARK COMMITTEE - Jack A. Stuart - cont. from November. <br /> <br />~1Ii'"r T r~~ 4/11111""""J~ ......4>.- ~ ~ 11-"""1)11...<1 J~~ h.. .... .4'" __1_,_,,~~~1~ ~ ..... 110.-.1 J>.--I.... I ~ -t...-. "IJT~I- '----.;f .... , I I!o.. '--' ~ 411 lLl--I,,"""" III.- ~"~ I'r <br /> <br />Continued to March meeting. <br /> <br />11 - BOND ISSUE PRIORITIES - Jack A.' S.tuart - cont. from November: <br /> <br />~J""~ ... "-"'t;,:I. ~ -bLL... .I>.- - - ~-~~ ~ ~ ......... 'I _U~~I"'I" .. ".' w- ~ ~ .... ""J~~flAI-- .. - .... L I>.- ~ .....~ ~ r..... -A- b--.- ~w;rf'to,. - ~ ........ <br /> <br />Commissioner Stuart said he and his committee, Commissioners Coffis <br />and Schenck, had met and were presenting a lis,t of pr imary pr ior i- <br />ties on the basis of s~rictly acquisition and completions and rec- <br />ommend that the order of priorities be as follows: <br /> <br />1 - We complete the Master Plan of Comm.unity park, which includes <br />the Ribera and Sue presentation and costs that go with it; <br />2 - Our picking up of various recreation areas, land acquisition; <br />3 - Golf course and acquire properties near the watershed area for a <br />driving range, a golf shop, restaurant, either on a lease basis or <br />purchase, plus access ways into area off Edgewood Road near State <br />College site; <br /> <br />---"----,-.---.----.-.-.-..------'.-..' ",.,..." ".", "_.,-,,-_.,-,,--~,_._---- <br /> <br />- ~~.,_. ,." "". ,,', -.- -- --"-" <br /> <br />.__.-'-_-_._"u.,._.~,---,--~.",.-_.~m_..___._~ .,."_"U,n',,,d,_-" <br />