PRC MIN 1970-02-04 - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

2' - to be still considered in city plans and had supported the min- iature plans idea; were impressed with drawings which had been , developed; and asked such questions as - could the creek be treated just as a natura~ stream, what funds, were available from bond monies, etc. - questions which hopef~lly could be snwered at the next meeting ëf the group. Mr. Ullrich, in response to commission request at the Jan. 7th meeting, provided the following inf~rmation: there was $1,555.00 in the storm drain bond fund - to complete the three upper reach- es of the Emerald branch of Redwood Creek, Stulsaft branch, and one other, and what is decided to be done in Community Park; the latest estimate by Jenks and Adamson for a closed boxed culvert 'is $177,000; if Council elects to do this on recommendation of the commission - the bond fund could be used for this entire amount; bond funds cannot be utilized for landscaping which goes on top of culvert; bond funds can be used for - re-alignment of creek, construction of the IIbox" and back-fill to protect box . but not for top soil fill and not for landscaping, re the open stream treatment designed by Ribera & Sue, the only portion of bond funds which could be used are - the concrete slab bottom, the 18u wing walls, and the eart~work ~nvolved in grading back the swale---an estimated $72,000 could be funded from bond monies for this work. The Ripera & Sue estimate for a recirculating stream system is $171,000, only $72,000 of which could come from bond funds. The Ribera & Sue plan woul,d end up with approx. 13,000 cu. yards of excess dirt which could probably be sold. Mr. Ullrich said he would provide us with a memorandum on ,the above. Mr. Ullrich said he would strongly recommend that the commission have someone from Jenks and Adamson give an opinion as they have some very serious reserves on the open stream plan - 1. the 1j.ydraulics system which they are not sure is feas,ible and 2. the prime concern of liability, not only of _Jenks and Adamson but of the City, of an open stream without fencing and the potential of youngsters getting in it and being swept into the pipes and dis- appearing into the boxed_sections. The commission asked Mr. Ullrich to have a representative from Jenks & Adamson present at our next meeting. (March 11). 4 - IICOMMUNITY PARK" DESIGNATE FOR STEINBERGER SUBDIVISION, SHORES: . see page ,6. 5 - G.A.P. STUDENTS: See page 6 and 7. - 6 - CPRS CONFERENCE, - Anaheim, Feb. 28/Mar. 4: See page 7 - 7 - CPRS. DISTRICT IV. MEETING, JAN. 17th: See page 7 ---~..-_-~--------------'~_.. -.-..- m_____---,- ..-------u_--_u_-----------,---- '._,---~---,--_....--,_.._- --____n__,_--..---------,--,