My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
PRC MIN 1975-04-09
RedwoodCity
>
Park and Rec Commission
>
Parks & Rec Comm Minutes
>
1970-1978
>
1975
>
PRC MIN 1975-04-09
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/29/2005 11:32:03 AM
Creation date
9/29/2005 10:55:08 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Park and Rec Comm
Park and Rec Comm - Document Type
Minutes
Date
4/9/1975
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br /> <br /> <br />~~ -~~ ::.. "~" -~ <br /> <br />" 73 <br /> <br />J. <br /> <br />of the area and it is suggested that the acreage of the park area in <br />the vacinity of the National Broadcasting Company property and the <br />Sewer Plant be redistributed within the neighborhood areas as described. <br />A small two to three neighborhood area could still be provided in the <br />vacinity of the Sewer Plant. <br /> <br />2. The concept of a community size park to be located somewhere in the <br />nvacinify.'of .Shell" Parkway and the waterway, as-indicated, was highly <br />acceptable and every effort should be made to provide for this centralized <br />park facility. <br /> <br />3. <br /> <br />It was agreed that the proposed Marina development would enhance and <br />- fulfill some of the mid.peninsula's boating needs. It was felt that <br />every effort should be made to provide for marina facilities either <br />at the location as shown on Belmont Slough, or at the location shown <br />at the northern most point of the peninsula. <br /> <br />4. <br /> <br />There was some concern about the configuration of the proposed park <br />areas throughout the plan. It was pointed out that precise planning <br />could possibly "~square off" several of these _areas so that. design can <br />be accommodated in order to provide greater use of the areas together <br />wi th aesthetic enhancement. It was fel t that the linear parkways <br />indicated on the plan should be developed and maintained by developers <br />wherever feasible rather than become a liability for public maintenance. <br /> <br />5. There was concern that the land use designation for the Scavenger pro- <br />perty was not included as a part of the Peninsula Plan. It was felt <br />that this area should be considered together with the Mobil Oil Estates <br />Plan. <br /> <br />6. <br /> <br />The question was raised as to whether or not the Land Use Section of <br />the Redwood Shores General Plan was consistent with the Land Use Plan <br />of the Redwood City General Plan as well as with the Waterfront Plan <br />and were the population growth figures for the area in compliance with <br />the projections of the General Plan. <br /> <br />7. <br /> <br />The traffic pattern, which indicates a bridge across the inland water. <br />way between Marine World Parkway and the proposed commercial center, <br />was questioned in that it was felt this crossing would inhibit the <br />"'recreational use of the waterway and possìbly result in severe can. <br />straints with respect to boating activities. It was felt this road- <br />. way should '"be -directed .around the waterway' rather .than"-across it. <br /> <br />MOTION: <br /> <br />Commissioner Pound moved to accept the report with the recom- <br />mendations to the Planning Commission, seconded by Commdssioner <br />Wj.lson. - -' . -. <br /> <br />The motion carried unanimously by voice vote. <br />Schenck was not present for the vote.) <br /> <br />{Commissioner <br /> <br />" <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.