Laserfiche WebLink
Departments continue to make progress on <br />expenditures (including encumbrances) totaling $34 million as of the end of March <br />2018. In FY 2016-17, the total CIP expenditure (including encumbrances) was <br />million. <br /> <br />Annual CIP expenditures are a function of project size, project phase, and staff resource <br />availability. While City Council has provided ample funding for projects over the years, <br />the ability to execute and deliver projects in a cost effective and timely man <br />dependent on the available staff resources. Based on past history, our current staff <br />resources generally will allow us to manage an annual CIP project load of up to $40 <br />million. <br /> <br /> <br />Threats to Existing Capital Revenues and <br />In light of the substantial gap <br />proposed five year CIP, staff will continue to research potential <br />Whenever possible, staff applies <br />projects across multiple funding sources. <br />that passed last year, increased gas taxes to pay for local road maintenance as well as <br />regional transportation infrastructure and public transit. The City w <br />for local road maintenance projects this year. This <br />jeopardy, however, due to efforts to repeal the tax. Additionally, capital funding <br />generated from the Utility Users Tax is stagnant <br />Departments continue to make progress on a wide range of CIP projects, with <br />expenditures (including encumbrances) totaling $34 million as of the end of March <br />17, the total CIP expenditure (including encumbrances) was <br />nnual CIP expenditures are a function of project size, project phase, and staff resource <br />availability. While City Council has provided ample funding for projects over the years, <br />the ability to execute and deliver projects in a cost effective and timely man <br />dependent on the available staff resources. Based on past history, our current staff <br />resources generally will allow us to manage an annual CIP project load of up to $40 <br />Threats to Existing Capital Revenues and Potential New Revenue Options <br />In light of the substantial gap between anticipated revenues and project needs in the <br />staff will continue to research potential funding options. <br />Whenever possible, staff applies for grants and state funds to distribute the <br />projects across multiple funding sources. SB 1, the Road Repair and Accountability <br />last year, increased gas taxes to pay for local road maintenance as well as <br />regional transportation infrastructure and public transit. The City will receive $1.4 million <br />for local road maintenance projects this year. This important new revenue source is in <br />jeopardy, however, due to efforts to repeal the tax. Additionally, capital funding <br />generated from the Utility Users Tax is stagnant while capital project costs are <br />wide range of CIP projects, with <br />expenditures (including encumbrances) totaling $34 million as of the end of March <br />17, the total CIP expenditure (including encumbrances) was $31.4 <br />nnual CIP expenditures are a function of project size, project phase, and staff resource <br />availability. While City Council has provided ample funding for projects over the years, <br />the ability to execute and deliver projects in a cost effective and timely manner is also <br />dependent on the available staff resources. Based on past history, our current staff <br />resources generally will allow us to manage an annual CIP project load of up to $40 <br /> <br />Options <br />between anticipated revenues and project needs in the <br />funding options. <br />to distribute the cost of CIP <br />SB 1, the Road Repair and Accountability Act <br />last year, increased gas taxes to pay for local road maintenance as well as <br />ill receive $1.4 million <br />revenue source is in <br />jeopardy, however, due to efforts to repeal the tax. Additionally, capital funding <br />l project costs are <br />9.A - Page 11