Laserfiche WebLink
R 1 !!!!!! NOM!! Not as proposed!!!Adamantly NO!!!!! <br />+2 1. We already have too much traffic. <br />+z 1 If we are going to add more office space then we need to add more housing. And in addition to <br />housing we need more hospitals, schools, fire, and government services to support the influx to our <br />community. <br />+z 1 - we're overcrowded already!!! <br />+2 1 we need more housing and more community investment from the businesses that are changing <br />the social and physical landscape of our community. We most certainly do not need more traffic <br />congestion. Please think about the infrastructure we would need to support such a development, and <br />please prioritize attending to the housing needs of current working and middle class community <br />members, not about more of the same kinds of developments that have been pushing all but the super <br />rich away from RWC. <br />+z 2: where will the necessary water come from? What will be done regarding the already massive <br />congestion at 101 and Woodside Rd? How much housing will be reserved for low income? If those <br />questions cannot be satisfactorily answered then No! <br />+i 2 shouldn't move forward without a comprehensive and realistic transportation plan <br />+1 1 infrastructure should be main focus, then new development <br />+1 1 - I strongly oppose the Harbor View project. Traffic is already horrendous in Redwood City. At this <br />point Redwood City has just gotten too money hungry! Stanford's building a huge complex that will <br />hold 5,000 jobs, apartments are going up all around Redwood City, Facebook has a huge building in <br />downtown. Redwood City. Next you have more cars coming into RWC, but they're reducing four lane <br />streets to two lanes to accommodate bike lanes, which I don't see being used that much. As it is right <br />now, I have difficulty getting out of my driveway in the morning with all the traffic and run into heavy <br />traffic going down small streets after work, trying to get home! So you're asking if we want to approve <br />this project! No!!@ <br />+1 1. Anything that makes the affordable housing crisis worse is a nonstarter. <br />+1 1, why more offices? How about affordable housing? The office spaces in Pacific Shores are still <br />empty ...fill those up first. <br />2, I'm opposed because nothing is ever planned out throughly and we have a serious traffic issue in <br />this particular area. Way too much overbuilding in a small condensed area. <br />