Laserfiche WebLink
ATTY/RESO.0041/CC RESO DENYING THE APPEAL FOR 353 MAIN STREET <br />REV: 05-14-18 PR <br />Page 3 of 28 <br />Project, and received and considered documentary evidence on the appeal and <br />application; and <br /> <br />WHEREAS, the City Council considered whether the Project is categorically <br />exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), <br />pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15332 (Class 32 - "Infill Development Projects") as <br />explained in the CEQA compliance memorandum attached to the staff report ("CEQA <br />Memorandum"), along with the previously adopted Mitigated Negative Declaration and <br />Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Checklist for the North Main Precise Plan, the staff <br />reports, oral and written, and testimony and materials presented by all those wishing to <br />be heard on this Project at the noticed public hearing on this matter; and <br /> <br />WHEREAS, the City Council determined that the proposed Planned <br />Community Permit, Density Bonus including a height concession, and Affordable <br />Housing Plan would further the purposes of and appropriately implement the City <br />of Redwood City General Plan, the North Main Street Precise Plan, and <br />applicable provisions of the Redwood City Municipal Code and Zoning <br />Ordinance. <br /> <br />NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF <br />THE CITY OF REDWOOD CITY AS FOLLOWS: <br /> <br />Section 1. The City Council, having independently heard, considered and <br />weighed all the evidence in the record, including evidence presented by City staff, <br />the Applicant, the Appellants and members of the public, and being fully informed <br />of the Project, the Planning Commission 's decision, and the appeal, finds that the <br />Appellant has not shown, based on evidence in the record, that the Planning <br />Commission's decision was made in error, that there was an abuse of d iscretion <br />by the Planning Commission, that the Planning Commission 's decision was <br />otherwise improper, or that the City's notices, agendas, and appeal procedures were <br />unlawful in any manner , and, in the exercise of its independent judgment , hereby <br />denies the appeal and approves the Planned Community Permit , Density Bonus <br />including a height concession, and Affordable Housing Plan based on the following <br />findings and subject to the Conditions of Approval set forth below. This <br />determination is based on the entire record, including without limitation the <br />application materials , the NMPP , NMPP Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND), <br />NMPP Mitigation, Monitoring and Reporting checklist (MMR), the entire record of the <br />administrative proceedings regarding the adoption of the NMPP, the General Plan, <br />the staff reports and attachments prepared for the Planning Commission hearing <br />on the Project and the appeal, each of which is incorporated herein by reference <br />and which serve as an adequate and appropriate evidentiary basis for the findings <br />7.B. - Page 28