My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
AgdaPkt 2018-05-21 Joint SA PFA
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Agenda Packets
>
2010-2019
>
2018
>
AgdaPkt 2018-05-21 Joint SA PFA
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/22/2018 3:10:38 PM
Creation date
5/17/2018 5:10:42 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Agenda Packet
Meeting Type
Joint
Agency Type
City Council and Successor Agency and Public Financing Authority
Date
5/21/2018
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
725
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
A 5 Build more housing. That's the top priority. More housing will lead to lower prices. <br />+2 4 - Project seems reasonable and has some affordable housing mixed in. Assuming this is part of <br />the Downtown Precise plan and acquisition of additional water rights was taken into account when <br />approving, I think this is largely a laudable project. Better understanding of public transport options <br />for housing that is farther from Caltrain, like this, would be useful. Adding housing to balance the <br />office space imbalance on the Peninsula seems important. This will also put downward pressure on <br />housing costs, wejust need an additional 10k units spread around RWC/San Carlos/Menlo Park. <br />+2 5. U don't require builders to build below market housing so will just increase traffic and crowds. <br />We need afford housing. 10% per building not enough. <br />+z 5. We need housing especially affordable especially near transit and near transit. And this is not in <br />the bay. <br />+1 5 - housing is much needed <br />+t 5: more housing is needed. i would expect that sakura/ carls jr, Peninsula Boardwalk etc will <br />eventually turn into 'Foster City'. Transportation, ie easier access to 101, is needed rather than these <br />residents then driving through already -congested RWC streets. <br />+1 4 -we still need housing <br />+1 S. Assuming it is compliant with the guidelines of the downtown precise plan. <br />+1 5. We need more housing in Redwood City and this residential building seems well planned with <br />many amenities that homeowners would find enjoyable and encouraging of community. <br />+1 4.1 know we need moreHousing but 19 out of 125 being affordable seems backwards to me. <br />+1 5. We need housing. Dear god do we need housing. <br />+1 5 Good location for apt. building. Will fit with the neighborhood. Entire project area should ensure <br />and encourage walkability to downtown businesses and services. As our downtown expands, retail at <br />the Kohl's shopping center (and Sequoia Station) should be better integrated with historic downtown <br />and considered downtown retail. Need to lessen auto dominance though. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.