My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
AgdaPkt 2018-05-21 Joint SA PFA
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Agenda Packets
>
2010-2019
>
2018
>
AgdaPkt 2018-05-21 Joint SA PFA
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/22/2018 3:10:38 PM
Creation date
5/17/2018 5:10:42 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Agenda Packet
Meeting Type
Joint
Agency Type
City Council and Successor Agency and Public Financing Authority
Date
5/21/2018
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
725
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
D] 5 We must build more units for the incoming workers. The additional supply should ease the out <br />of whack rent situation at some point. To the people worried about parking, Redwood City has <br />fantastic public transportation and cars are already not needed is some cases. With additional <br />development we can get to a situation where Redwood City can truly be walkable city. <br />+t 4, c'mon people, Redwood City is a big player now, it's not sleepy little Belmont any more where <br />the biggest retailer on Broadway is the Army-Navy surplus store. We have a process, the project was <br />deemed worthy, move on. <br />+t 4. As long as there is adequate parking for each residential unit. The City should never allow <br />developers to reduce parking because of proximity to transit or concessions as to affordability. In this <br />stage of human history where we live people will drive cars to and for work and for play <br />LLIJ S. We should not impede economic / population development but instead should also fast track <br />any transportation improvements like BARt, CalTrain, buses or even a new connection to light <br />rail.Population increase and more businesses/office buildings aren't the problem: California's <br />laughable public transportation system is the problem. There's no reason we shouldn't be on par with <br />other great cities like New York, London or Paris when it comes to effective and affordable public <br />transportation. If we succeed in this, then we can easily support the economic and population growth <br />we're experiencing. <br />I support the project hopefully the project will meet or exceed its commitment <br />5 We need more housing. I definitely support this project. Rents are out of control. <br />S. Redwood City needs more housing. I've read the opposing documents. To me the do not hold <br />water. The project looks attractive & will provide adequate parking. <br />5. Yes. We need this. I especially appreciate they are including some portion that are affordable. <br />5 hopefully no subsidized affordable units. <br />4 but lower the building height <br />S. We need more housing. <br />S. RWC desperately needs more housing for all the jobs that have recently come into town. <br />4. Def need more housing, esp if rent is reasonable <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.