My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
Agmt05 Moffatt & Nichol Engineer
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Agreements
>
2000-2009
>
2005
>
Agmt05 Moffatt & Nichol Engineer
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/1/2013 4:22:17 PM
Creation date
1/3/2006 10:26:40 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Agreement
Contractor Name
Moffatt & Nichol Engineers
PROJECT NAME
engineering & design services
RMP File Number
304
Date
12/28/2005
MO Ref
05-222, 08-220, 13-132
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
46
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />Redwood Shores Lagoon Dredging Project <br />Scope of Services - Moffatt & Nichol <br /> <br />Since the Redwood Shores Lagoon is not technically part of the "Bay" as defined by BCDC, it <br />presents some unique advantages as well as constraints. Disposal at Alcatraz, even if <br />technically possible, would most likely not be permitted because it would be considered as an <br />external source. The dredging itself will very likely not be subject to a BCDC permit, but if a <br />disposal site within BCDC jurisdiction is utilized, then a BCDC permit will be required. Also, <br />because the lagoon is not considered to be part of the Bay, other resource agencies such as <br />Fish & Wildlife Service and Fish and Game will have a lesser review role. Most Bay dredging <br />projects have significant permit conditions imposed on them - it is likely that this project will be <br />subject only to standard requirements related to water quality and public health. <br /> <br />We anticipate that the project will need an Army Corps individual permit under Section 404 of <br />the Clean Water Act and a Water Quality Certification from the SfRWQCB. In addition, if the <br />material is proposed to be disposed at an upland/ marsh location, permits from other agencies <br />may be required. The DMMO permit application serves as a joint application for both <br />agencies, as well as others should they be required. Wetland restoration projects which need <br />fill and already have a permit do not require additional environmental review for each disposal <br />episode, so it is possible that disposal at such locations may not require additional permits for <br />the lagoon project. We will assist the City with preparing the permit applications and prepare <br />necessary graphics for the same. <br /> <br />Some form of CEQA and/or NEPA review may be necessary which could be determined after <br />the disposal site is identified. We have not included a scope for preparing environmental <br />documents, because it is pre-mature to do so without identifying a disposal site or defining <br />other project components. <br /> <br />Public perception of dredged material as a "waste" is another significant constraint during the <br />public review process for residential areas. In many cases, a public outreach/ awareness <br />program has to be implemented by the local government to educate the community about the <br />need and the impacts of dredging. We will coordinate with the City's public outreach <br />consultant and provide necessary facts and figures for a newsletter or, if necessary, a <br />workshop to educate the public on construction means and methods. <br /> <br />Deliverable: DMMO Permit application including project description, graphics, and tables <br /> <br />Task 2.2 - Prepare Bid Documents <br /> <br />Design of the project and preparation of plans, specifications, and engineer's estimates are <br />relatively straightforward for dredging projects. This project will likely be controlled in large part <br />by the ability to properly anticipate and negotiate the permit conditions without delay or <br />incurring additional expense. In particular, the matter of unauthorized overdepth dredging has <br />become a significant issue in the dredging industry, since the threat of regulatory enforcement <br />has increased the liability of both contractors and owners. Dredgers faced with the increased <br />risk are passing the costs on, or simply refusing to bid on excessively risky work. Several <br />solutions are possible; M&N will work with the City and the regulatory community to develop a <br />practical solution to this problem so that work can be competitively bid. The project approach <br />and schedule places emphasis on this item to better minimize this risk. <br /> <br />M&N will prepare design drawings, technical specifications, and estimates of construction cost. <br />The design will consider sequencing of dredging operations to accommodate environmental <br />requirements (fish windows), lagoon operations, and disposal site constraints. Plans, <br />specifications, and cost estimates will be submitted for City review and comment at the 65% <br /> <br />6 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.