AgdaPkt 2018-07-23 Joint SA PFA - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

6.3.B. - Page 3 modifications and on the project prioritization system to better reflect community concerns. ANALYSIS In response to the City Council's feedback on the draft Plan and in consultation with the CSAC, the following changes were incorporated into the Final Plan. Further highlight the importance of safety • Updated the vision statement as follows: "Promote the best travel experience possible for everyone in Redwood City by creating and maintaining a safe, multimodal, safe, and accessible transportation network." • Updated goal statements as follows: o Added a new Goal 1 — Eliminate traffic fatalities and severe iniuries for all modes by 2030 o Revised Goal 2 (was Goal 1): Create a walking and bicycling -friendly community that provides a safe, balanced, and convenient, and safe transportation system. o Revised Goal 5 (was Goal 4): A thieve mode orifit target o Reach over 50% of all trips being made by non -driving modes by 2040; most remaining autemobile trips should be shared rides and/or zero emission trips. • Project list was revised to include new projects with safety benefits • Safety is weighted by a factor of 3 when prioritizing projects Revisit how voiects are prioritized • Added weighting factors for the following performance measures: safety (x3), increasing non -driving trips (x2), increasing person throughput (x2) • Added a policy feedback loop o Neighborhood Associations provide input on "Neighborhood Priority Projects" o CSAC provides input on Tier 1, Tier 2, and Signature project lists Evaluate our progress over time • Recommended monitoring projects to evaluate their effectiveness • Added biannual monitoring of the transportation system (see Table 5 in the Plan on page 101) Incorporate elements to keep the plan relevant to the changinq environment 0 Added "Emerging Technologies" section in Chapter 2 (page 21)