Laserfiche WebLink
10.A. - Page 58 <br />Together, these amendments remove non -substantive procedural steps associated with <br />budget adoption. They do not alter the substantive information required to be included in <br />the budget, nor do they change the general requirement to make copies of the budget <br />available for inspection by the public or the requirement to hold a public hearing on the <br />budget. <br />Consistent with other proposed amendments, the proposed amendments to Sections 51 <br />and 51.5 also update public noticing requirements associated with budget adoption. <br />Section 51 currently states that copies of the budget do not need to be placed on file <br />with the City Clerk if the Council chooses to publish the budget in the official newspaper. <br />Because the City has no official newspaper and because it is impracticable to print a <br />several hundred -page budget in any newspaper, the proposed amendments remove <br />this reference to newspaper publication. Similarly, where Section 51.5 currently requires <br />notice of the public hearing on the budget and the public availability of the budget to be <br />published in the official newspaper, the proposed amendments require that notice be <br />published in accordance with procedures established by an ordinance of the Council. <br />5) Gendered Language and Standardized Usage <br />The City Charter reflects the era of its adoption in its use of masculine language to <br />describe City officials and employees. The proposed amendments modernize the <br />language of the Charter by replacing gendered language with neutral language. The <br />proposed amendments also delete current Section 72.5, which explains that references <br />to the masculine gender throughout the Charter should be interpreted as including both <br />masculine and feminine genders. <br />The proposed amendments also standardize capitalization throughout the document <br />and make other conforming, non -substantive changes. <br />Recommended Amendments (First Proposed to the Full Council on June 25, 2018): <br />1) Appointment of Citv Clerk by City Manager <br />The Committee recommends amendments to Section 21 (Officers and Boards) and <br />Section 32 (City Clerk). Under the current Charter, the City Clerk is appointed directly by <br />the City Council. In order to maximize organizational efficiency, the City Council <br />recommends amending the Charter to provide that the City Clerk will be appointed by <br />the City Manager. This approach is consistent with the approach taken by many other <br />California charter cities. <br />2) Consolidation of Financial Offices <br />The Committee recommends amendments to Section 31 (Director of Finance), Section <br />33 (City Auditor), Section 34 (City Treasurer), Section 35 (City Assessor), and Section <br />36 (City Collector). The City Charter currently provides for a Director of Finance who is <br />directed to perform the duties of the City Treasurer, City Assessor, and City Collector. <br />Page 5 of 8 <br />