My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
AgdaPkt 2018-09-10 Joint SA PFA
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Agenda Packets
>
2010-2019
>
2018
>
AgdaPkt 2018-09-10 Joint SA PFA
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/11/2018 8:39:31 AM
Creation date
9/6/2018 5:49:59 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Agenda Packet
Date
9/10/2018
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
468
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
6.1.B. - Page 14 <br />Procurement Cooperation or C -CPC). <br />Unlike the Cities, the County maintains a hybrid centralized/decentralized purchasing system, <br />which includes a dedicated procurement division. Under the County's system, the County of San <br />Mateo's Procurement Division (PD) is generally responsible for purchases of goods that are <br />greater than $5,000, while individual departments retain responsibility for smaller purchases.58 <br />The PD employs a staff of specialized buyers to fulfill its purchasing functions. In FY 2015- <br />2016, the County spent more than $300 million on goods and services.59 <br />Collaborating with the County's Procurement Department (PD) provides a unique opportunity <br />for C -CPC to maximize cost savings for all parties. <br />As described above, specialized purchasing agents in centralized purchasing departments have <br />the training, experience, and resources to identify superior vendors and negotiate lower prices <br />using their entity's market power. Were the Cities to collaborate with the PD in their purchases <br />of common goods and services, they could increase their purchasing power and thereby facilitate <br />even greater savings than from their own intercity cooperative purchasing agreements. <br />This example demonstrates one way the Cities could collaborate with the PD: <br />• The PD coordinates with City finance officers to identify the common goods and <br />services used by participating entities. <br />• The PD competitively negotiates and awards contracts for those goods and services <br />that allow for the Cities to piggyback on the contract. <br />• During negotiations, PD purchasing agents implement volume -discounting, such that <br />the participation of any of the Cities thereafter unlocks lower prices for all parties. <br />• Once the PD finalizes these contracts, City finance officers disseminate <br />internal lists of preferred vendors under these agreements, in accordance with <br />the Cities' preferred vendor requirements, to their respective departments. <br />• To minimize impact on City employees, and thereby increase transition costs, <br />authorized city employees should be able to buy goods and services in a <br />method similar to their current systems. <br />For instance, buyers would search the County Purchasing System for the <br />desired goods, generate a purchase order through the system, and that pending <br />order would be sent to the appropriate city purchasing authority for review <br />and approval. <br />Upon approval, the County Purchasing System executes the order, sending it <br />to the vendor. The County Purchasing System also tallies the order for <br />discounts, recording and reporting to the City the initial savings from <br />negotiated prices and additional volume discounts. <br />" Interview with County Finance Officials. <br />59 San Mateo County Civil Grand Jury, "San Mateo County Procurement Division Recommendations Follow -Up" <br />(2017) 2. <br />2017-2018 San Mateo County Civil Grand Jury 11 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.