My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
AgdaPkt 2018-09-10 Joint SA PFA
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Agenda Packets
>
2010-2019
>
2018
>
AgdaPkt 2018-09-10 Joint SA PFA
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/11/2018 8:39:31 AM
Creation date
9/6/2018 5:49:59 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Agenda Packet
Date
9/10/2018
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
468
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
6.1.B. - Page 16 <br />sustainability and economic growth.65 Specifically, Alameda County invites public entities <br />within its jurisdiction to piggyback on green contracts, in order to achieve lower prices, defray <br />the higher costs associated with sustainable materials, and promote environmental sustainability <br />among public agencies .66 To facilitate this C -CPC, Alameda County opens its Procurement <br />Department and Contracts Team to support and facilitate local public agencies piggybacking on <br />sustainable contracts.67 While both Los Angeles County and Alameda County leveraged <br />cooperative purchasing to achieve environmental objectives, the success of these programs <br />underscores the effectiveness of City -County Procurement Cooperation for achieving cost <br />savings. <br />However, there are barriers to collaboration between the Cities and the County. The Grand Jury <br />has already issued three reports (in 2004, 2015, and 2017), identifying dysfunction within the <br />County's procurement system. Among other issues, the 2016-2017 Grand Jury identified that the <br />PD's subordination to a Deputy Director of Human Resources, is inconsistent with best practices <br />set forth by the Institute for Public Procurement and the California Association of Public <br />Procurement Officials and inconsistent with the operational practices of 45 California Counties. 68 <br />The 2016-2017 Civil Grand Jury concluded that the Procurement Division manager lacked <br />sufficient independent authority to implement the changes necessary to improve County <br />procurement. Moreover, as of the date of this writing, the County's Procurement Division <br />manager position is vacant with the County's most recent director having left for employment <br />with another public entity. <br />While the PD is not functioning well now, the County can take steps to improve the PD's <br />function. Revising the County's purchasing process to allow effective cooperation between the <br />Cities and the County will not only grant access to aforementioned savings, but also lower <br />current operational costs. To that end, the Grand Jury has identified nine checkpoints along the <br />pathway toward City -County Procurement Cooperation. The first three checkpoints are steps the <br />County can take to prepare for C -CPC. The remaining checkpoints are actions the PD needs to <br />take in order to implement C -CPC. <br />65 "Strategic Vision 2026" The County of Alameda, Accessed on April 20, 2018 <br />http://www.ac2ov.org/2ovemment/strate2ic.htm. <br />66 "piggybacking" The County of Alameda, Accessed on: April 20, 2018 <br />httr)s://www.acRov.ore/sustain/what/Durchasine/bids/Dice_ vback.htm. <br />61 Stop Waste "Piggybacking for Green Purchasing" The County of Alameda, Accessed on: April 20, 2018 <br />htt )s://www.aceov.ore/sustain/documents/Pisevbackin2Resources.ndf. <br />68 San Mateo County Civil Grand Jury, "San Mateo County Procurement Division Recommendations Follow -Up": <br />5-6. <br />2017-2018 San Mateo County Civil Grand Jury 13 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.