Laserfiche WebLink
<br />APPENDIX 1 <br /> <br />UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS <br />SCOPE OF SERVICES <br /> <br />6-1E <br />Page 33 <br /> <br />CITY OF REDWOOD CITY <br />FEBRUARY 27,2006 <br /> <br />conveyance, and storm water quality systems that may stem from the proposed project scenarios. <br />Nolte will present these impacts to City Staff in a memorandum and meeting. <br /> <br />Task 8 - Development of Alternative Solutions <br /> <br />Launching from the results of work conducted in Task 6, altemative capital improvement <br />projects wi11 be identified for each solution the following steps will be executed: <br /> <br />. Assembly of Project Detai1s <br />.. Cost and capacity of each capital improvement <br />" Design criteria for infrastructure improvements <br />,. Anticipated timing of each capital improvement <br />.. Capital project altematives, such as potential project phasing options <br />II Projected development within the Precise Plan area <br />.. Estimated water, wastewater and stormwater characteristics of proposed development <br />II Estimated growth rates or alternatives for evaluation <br /> <br />. Evaluation of Project Funding Options <br /> <br />Identify funding altematives for capital improvement needs within the Precise Plan area. <br />Discuss advantages, disadvantages, and implications of various financing approaches. <br />Financing options may include various types of debt and pay-as-you-go cash funding from <br />connection fees and/or rates. <br /> <br />II Evaluation of Cost Allocation Alternatives <br /> <br />Evaluate methods for allocating capital project costs to future users. Cost allocation <br />altematives may include equal cost allocation throughout Precise Plan area, project by <br />project cost al1ocation, and/or allocations between Precise Plan area and the City as a whole. <br />Discuss benefits and drawbacks ofthe various cost-allocation altematives. <br /> <br />~. Determination of Impacts of Financing Alternatives <br /> <br />Estimate the financial impacts of the various financing and cost allocation alternatives. <br />Present findings in easily readable tables and/or charts. <br /> <br />8 Evaluation of Fee Structures to Equitably Recover Costs <br /> <br />Identify and evaluate fee structure alternatives for equitably recovering the costs of necessary <br />capital projects. Discuss advantages and disadvantages of various approaches. <br /> <br />Task 9 - Recommendations for Mitigation of Impacts <br /> <br />Mitigation measures wiIJ be evaluated through the presentation of a comparison matrix. The <br />development of mitigation concepts will foJIow an "objectives oriented hierarchy analysis" <br /> <br />~----_. <br /> <br />._~~,.__.".,,-_..,,'~--- <br /> <br />-,>~-_.,..-..------_.".._----,~ <br /> <br />~ <br /> <br />4 of9 <br /> <br />."OND ,...,,""""NG <br /> <br />N:\BDNCS\Redwood City\Downtown Precise Plan\Dclv\Final Scope" Vcr 2_02-28-06.doc <br />