My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
AgdaPkt 2018-10-22 Joint SA PFA
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Agenda Packets
>
2010-2019
>
2018
>
AgdaPkt 2018-10-22 Joint SA PFA
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/7/2018 8:12:49 AM
Creation date
10/18/2018 5:46:31 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Agenda Packet
Meeting Type
Joint
Agency Type
City Council and Successor Agency and Public Financing Authority
Date
10/22/2018
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
413
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
2- Definitely we need more enforcement of parking violations especially in downtown. But it <br />is true the lower income neighborhoods are often targeted more than the more affluent <br />neighborhoods. I would rather have a crack down first on texting and driving violations. There <br />is plenty of revenue for RWC just enforcing that. All cops need to do is hang out at traffic <br />lights. <br />1. Instead of handing out tickets how about providing more parking? All these multistory <br />buildings going up should be required to provide affordable public parking as part of the <br />deal! <br />2.1 remember living in San Francisco, unable to park in front of my own apartment, forced to <br />walk half an hour to move my car every day. I hated it: that's <br />2. Is it clear that the tickets would pay for the officers? What happens if not? <br />2) There should already be a fair amount of parking enforcement by RWC if cars are parked <br />illegally on red curbs or in front of fire hydrants. This is something the city should already be <br />budgeting for and taking seriously enough to address outright, without further need for extra <br />prompting. <br />21 don't get why? Are people parking illegally enough for this to be cost effective? <br />I strongly oppose.. I'm retired and several years ago a legal sticker on my car stated that my car <br />would be towed if not moved within 72.1 have a health condition and there are times that I <br />am not able to move my car for a few days at a time. However people can be very <br />inconsiderate on the way they park their cars here especially when parked in the first or last <br />position on a stretch of curb. The car in the first position won't drive close to the front edge of <br />the curb and will take a space and a half and the last car takes a space and a half by not <br />backing up close to end of curb. I'm not talking about merely a foot of space. It's when they <br />take a space and a half of car space in the first or last position. There's no rhyme or reason for <br />it. Thank You <br />Neutral/don't know: <br />+6 3. 1 think it's very optimistic to assume that ticket revenue would completely cover the cost <br />of these new employees <br />+2 3. 1 think catching people speeding on residential streets is more of a priority <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.