Laserfiche WebLink
R 3 tough call. I agree that people ought to respect red zones, cross walks and that <br />enforcement is probably the best way to get people's attention. Paying park8ng enforcement <br />from parking revenue seems like a goid udea. But what has parking revenue been used for up <br />until now? How will we replace it?Maybe there could be a warning, a half price ticket, and only <br />on 3rd violation, full ticket cost. <br />+t I don't know but what if you want to park in front of your own driveway to add another <br />parking spot. You shouldn't get a ticket. <br />+1 3 it's is frustrating when random people park in front of your house when there are other <br />places to park for days at a time leaving me and my family to try to find places down the <br />street to park our cars but leaving our cars in front of our own property days at a time can be <br />normal and shouldn't be penalized <br />3 If it would <br />be financially <br />positive and <br />socially beneficial, then sure. However I am not sure it <br />would be. <br />This problem doesn't affect me in any way so don't feel qualified to vote on it.Thanks Brian! <br />3. I'm not personally affected, and I don't know enough about the pros and cons to actually <br />vote one way or the other on this. <br />The solution should be permit parking, with heavier enforcement. 72 hours limit is too <br />difficult to regulate <br />3 - try to see if opposing is correct, don't charge and insider ways for responding to that issue <br />instead <br />If multi unit are being allowed to be built on what was previously a single unit property, the <br />city is creating this problem and now wants to punish residents for the problem the city <br />created. <br />3 1 don't have a car, and if I did, I have a parking spot so this isn't something I ever think about <br />3;1 don't live in an over parked neighborhood, so it's hard to assess how much of an impact <br />(positive or negative) increased policing would have. <br />