Laserfiche WebLink
7.B. - Page 16 of 18 <br />Noise and Vibration was analyzed and the EIR found that potential impacts to noise <br />sensitive land uses and areas would be less than significant upon compliance with the <br />policies and programs of the General Plan. General Plan policies and programs minimize <br />the potential impacts of noise by establishing noise level standards, noise regulation <br />enforcement, and limiting hours of operation adjacent to noise sensitive areas. The <br />proposed Zoning Amendment would not have any impacts on noise and vibration. Any <br />future development would result in temporary construction noise and ongoing operational <br />noise. <br />Population and Housing was analyzed and the EIR and found a potential to induce <br />population growth as a result of new employment opportunities. While any potential <br />automobile dealership would likely not provide a significant number of additional jobs over <br />the previous health/fitness club and restaurant uses, such a proposal would undergo its <br />own CEQA analysis in connection with a Conditional Use Permit application. The proposed <br />zoning amendment however would not create an additional impact on Population and <br />Housing. <br />Public Services was analyzed and the EIR found impacts to police, fire protection and <br />emergency access to be less than significant because General Plan policies and programs <br />ensure funding for adequate fire protection and require new development to provide <br />adequate access for emergency vehicles. The Zoning Amendment would not have an effect <br />on public services. Any future development would be reviewed for emergency access <br />requirements. <br />Recreation, Parks, and Open Space was analyzed and the project would result in a less <br />than significant impact because it is not a residential project. <br />Utilities were analyzed and the EIR found impacts to be less than significant except for <br />impacts related to water supply, discussed below. The project would not have an effect on <br />utilities. Future development would be evaluated for utility connections. <br />Greenhouse Gas Emissions (GHGs) from land use and transportation were analyzed as <br />well as potential impacts from sea level rise associated with GHGs. Individual projects are <br />required to comply with federal, state, and local regulations related to GHG emissions. The <br />General Plan EIR found that "Although the amount and distribution of allowable <br />development under the New General Plan has the potential to increase population and <br />economic activity within the plan area, thereby potentially resulting in a significantly <br />increased level of GHG emissions, a number of factors within and external to the New <br />General Plan indicate that development allowable under the New General Plan would result <br />in lower GHG emissions per capita relative to existing conditions." Thus, impacts related to <br />GHG emissions are less than significant. The Zoning Amendment does not contribute to <br />GHG emissions. Future development would be analyzed for compliance with CEQA, which <br />may include additional GHG emissions analysis. <br />The General Plan EIR analyzed impacts related to Energy. The General Plan area receives <br />energy from private utilities regulated by federal and state regulatory bodies. The General <br />Page 6 of 8 <br />147 <br />