Laserfiche WebLink
5 what a wonderful idea! <br />S. Solid bus service to the port from three directions handles part of opponents' complaint. <br />And we need Caltrain. BART(!), buses ... as many alternatives to CO emitting vehicles as possible <br />5 1 take Caltrain but would also take a ferry. The Ferry building is more convenient than the <br />train station for some things. <br />5 We need more alternative forms of transit and ferries are a fun and practical way to get <br />around. I don't understand why it would take until 2026 to get this built - let's get this <br />approved ASAP. <br />5. We have been supportive of Ferry Service for many years. Thank you for finally giving it the <br />consideration it deserves! <br />5 Caltrain and freeways are over crowded. Caltrain only goes to soma were ferries go <br />downtown. Ferry service will be very valuable now and into the future. <br />5. I'm surprised that this service has still not been implemented. <br />5. A ferry service in the port is a closer option for south Redwood City residents than Caltrain <br />4 better ports need to be built in SF and Redwood City. Perhaps adding a landing/boarding <br />area near the new Chase center will be great because of the growth of offices in this particular <br />area.On the Redwood City side, public transportation to the port needs to improve drastically <br />5, increasing public transit options to SF or more importantly east bay should be considered <br />in an effort to combat traffic issues. Many people will jump at the ability to travel that doesn't <br />involve sitting in hours of traffic <br />5(sent with Gentle Effect) <br />5 this makes sense on many levels. <br />