Laserfiche WebLink
5. The argument that the location being nine minutes from downtown is not realistic to <br />someone who commuted for twenty years. It already takes seven minutes to drive from my <br />home to Whipple and 101 then I have a thirty plus minute commute to BART. Nine minutes to <br />the ferry with adequate parking for the day would allow me to reduce time spent driving to <br />reading, working on my laptop, relaxing coming and going. And it would be one last car on <br />101 daily. The ferry is a win win for Redwood City. <br />5 this opens the door for cross bay services which would be much more useful <br />5 yes, need to increase public transit options to relieve traffic. I would use this service regularly <br />5 this would be awesome. Should have another one from San Jose. <br />4. Other than the people working at the business park next to the port, the ferry will be slower <br />mode of transport. However it would be an asset to RWC. <br />4 It's got to be a matter of efficiency and adoption: When traveling by ferry is a viable <br />alternative by factors time and cost to sitting in traffic by car or commuting by train. <br />Embedded in a bus shuttle service to Sequoia Station this might actually work out <br />5 - We would love to take a ferry to the city rather than drive. Please consider adding service to <br />the pier at Giants stadium on game days. <br />5 -Amazing how we go back at least 60 + years to when we had ferry service on the bay. <br />Should really help to alleviate the heavy traffic on 101 mid peninsula <br />S. A great option especially for commuting from March - October. <br />5 although I most likely won't be around by then I am all in favor of a ferry service. What a <br />great idea II <br />5. if it is too hard for passengers to drive to the ferry terminal, there could be shuttle busses. <br />5 ferry is constant time and the trip is nice (I commuted using my employers ferry service <br />here). It's well worth it. <br />