My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
AgdaPkt 2019-02-25 Joint SA PFA
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Agenda Packets
>
2010-2019
>
2019
>
AgdaPkt 2019-02-25 Joint SA PFA
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/2/2020 10:15:52 AM
Creation date
2/21/2019 5:32:56 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Agenda Packet
Meeting Type
Joint
Agency Type
City Council and Successor Agency and Public Financing Authority
Date
2/25/2019
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
486
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
8.A. - Page 35 of 77 <br />Summary of Feedback on Conceptual Designs <br />Supportive <br />Themes <br />Requests <br />for Changes <br />VEt <br />Bike Infrastructure: Support of bike connectivity, green painted bike lanes, and protected bike lanes <br />with raised curb. <br />Safety at Intersections: Support of enhancements that improve pedestrian comfort when <br />crossing the corridor. <br />• Traffic Improvements: Support of improvements to flow and connectivity throughout corridor such as <br />realignment of Cedar and modifying traffic signals to include bike detection/calling. <br />• Traffic Calming: Support of elements that reduce vehicle speeds particularly for right turn movements such <br />as raised crossings and slip lane closures. <br />• Traffic Calming: Request for additional improvements that reduce turning movements at side streets. <br />• Extend Left Turn Pocket Length: Extend left turn pocket length onto Roosevelt as left turn queue often <br />spills back into adjacent lanes. <br />• Street Width Concern: Concern that narrowness of cross streets to accommodate bikes and peds, <br />particularly at Redwood Ave, will impact the current traffic flow along EI Camino. <br />• Streetscape: Support for more green infrastructure/beautification along EI Camino <br />Opposition <br />Themes <br />I General: Concern that bus/bike improvements would create more congestion, perception of lack of use of <br />�U bike facilities along EI Camino, and concern that left turn bike boxes cause confusion for vehicular traffic. <br />Figure 6 <br />Interactive Survey <br />184 <br />20 <br />_ ( What atldilions-1d you like to seep Please be sp_. <br />LEFT TURNS RES D <br />Wh—dditions wouldyou like to see?Pkax b—it—itic. <br />_ <br />9a <br />comments <br />Adwtlonal comments: I'm concerned wat we back up of can waking <br />' <br />for me light at redwood would block Ne IeIl Wm onto wpodslde <br />wesmound. <br />Additional Comments: A great itlea to slowdown southbound ELC <br />halfic Anticipate M1ere <br />'t <br />even more. some rear<ntl accitleMs as well_. <br />ELc tralre <br />��c <br />vmnmere enaacacems nereaswm_. wM wen mwe.Meo,etescme�ea- <br />tt <br />Atltlitional Comments: share conttrn on nartowriess of Retlwoadb <br />5� <br />-..• <br />- _ —_�_ <br />d— b k e �s <br />cestnan car Backup onto Redwootl rt Here <br />light <br />gM1[9 g4 Ricflaw Cars wont move as easily as they tlo <br />uy <br />'sdewalk <br />����� <br />�ir <br />�� <br />Cer <br />�• <br />_,raaeeeuk emaausmeo.emrelmrcen�. camwmr mo.e aawem� <br />184 <br />20 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.