Laserfiche WebLink
5 el Camino deserves to be a destination that hosts walkers, tourists, bikers, strollers, shoppers, <br />busses, trolleys and cars. As envisioned by The Grand Boulevard Initiative. Improving el Camino will <br />increase business values of retail and other uses and make it a better experience for all. Strongly <br />support the planning visionff <br />5 yes do everything we can do to make the streets safer for pedestrians and cyclists <br />4. It coks well t;.oJgh. cut, but I am concerned about the loss of street parking between Maple & <br />Pine. Whi:a ). i`. ser: -n to park ther_, many do. How would this affect the raievant businessas? Is <br />them a p.a-.:, --.:—'c, srLces anywhers? <br />41 would prefer bicycEina safety on middlefield south of woodside though <br />5 Pedestrian and cyclist safety is of utmost importance. <br />5 th;-.: :. _. ', L nac said, this doesn't mean wanton displacement. <br />4, I v. is''i __ ,rr,tacied bicycle boulevard from, San Mateo to south Sunnyvale. This is a step <br />in the Jc -a r a *ior ut doasn't go nearly far enough. <br />Stro-ialy agrea. T; =at area needs improvement <br />5 as a bicycle commuter it I imperative to create safe passage for people to get out of their cars to <br />reduce pollution. <br />S. We should always strive to improve pedestrian and cyclist safety on our roads. <br />S. YesfLet's make 'El Camino safer for everyone! <br />S. Currant situation very unsafe for both pedestrians and cyclists <br />5 wca'd Great '.= DU we're adding ded;cated bike !ane along EI Camino through PWC. But the <br />protected crossings help. <br />4. This looks Iikr a well thought out plan. I would just try and minimize shared right turn zones as <br />much as ooss:'c:a oecause ! always find them dangerous both as a pedestrian/bicyclist and driver. <br />