Laserfiche WebLink
5 - pedestrian & bicycle safety is very important to me. I'm happy to see RWC take this important <br />step. <br />5 1 strongly support this as an avid bicyclist who is very concerned about bicycle safety <br />I support this but I would like to see ail of EI Camino improve. Some areas look very tacky. This is <br />the first impression that visitors get and it doesn't do our town justice <br />5 this bold, cutting edge plan will greatly improve the ECR corridor for its residents and pedestrians <br />as well as bicyclists, and will make us the envy of many other Peninsula cities. Nothing realiv <br />significant and worth doing won't have naysayers ... let's have the courage not to be c=awed ,y them <br />and do this! <br />5 Will it bottleneck that area at all? <br />5 yes those roads are very dangerous. Why aren't there more overpasses or under the road <br />walkways, <br />5 - but ary plan to improve safety should seek to alleviate the congestion of that stretcn of El <br />Camino Real. <br />5 "Five'i have actually had a incident there plus a few scary moments.Needs help, needs a iot of <br />help. <br />In opposition: <br />+7 2 rct sure what exactly will be dcne, but EI Camino `s already a parking_ i - an-', .'-- -aed <br />to lose any lanes. <br />+e 1 they are putting trees and grassy mediums in turn lanes which are oars of my;jrrent <br />commute. Traffic is already bad enough and now you are going to have grid Icck at t. -,e feeder turn <br />areas off of EI Camino. Not an improvement! <br />+5 1 - I don't support encouraging bicycles to travel on a state highway.P.edw:)od City deeds to <br />invest in grade separation over the highway and train tracks and should dedicate alternate north <br />south routes through the city on either side of the train tracks using one way streets as necessary. <br />