Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Be <br />Page 3 <br /> <br />liability to the City is limited as the shuttle vendor will hold the primary insurance for its <br />vehicles if a vendor is contracted to provide the shuttle vehicles and drivers. <br /> <br />In addition to the role of managing the Shuttle Program, the Shuttle Stakeholder Group <br />recommends the operational and financial management of the Redwood City Shuttle <br />Pilot Program to be provided utilizing Alliance Operated - Alliance-Managed method. <br />The pros and cons are included as follows, with tWQ altematives: <br /> <br />Recommended Method <br /> <br />1. Alliance Operated - Alliance Managed: Under this scenario, the shuttle is added <br />to an existing Alliance shuttle service contract (pending Alliance Board of Directors <br />approval). All grant rights related to this service are transferred to the Alliance. The <br />Alliance pays the monthly invoice with employer/city contributions and grant receipts. <br />The City guarantees to cover funding shortfalls within a pre-determined limit (not to <br />exceed the $75,000 annual Capital Improvement Program (CIP) budget under <br />Traffic Impact Fees). Due to agency cash flow constraints, the City will likely need to <br />pay the Alliance for service in advance. "Fhe Alliance would formally l'llaI"lage the <br />day-to-day service on the City's behalf and supply quarterly shuttle reports to the <br />city's designated contact. <br /> <br />Pros - Ci <br />i Service is placed under existing <br />Alliance shuttle vendor contract <br />eliminating a service bid requirement. <br />Service could begin sooner. <br /> <br />Negligible city staff time required as <br />Alliance would assume most aspects of <br />I the shuttleserviee. Staff time to <br />include such items as legal transferring <br />of grant rights, Public Works assistance <br />with shuttle sign installation, payment <br />of city contribution invoices, occasional <br />meetings to obtain city input on service <br /> <br />I Cons - Ci <br />Requires Alliance Board of Directors' <br />approval to add service and for a <br />budgetary adjustment. <br /> <br />Loss of "ownership" to constituents. <br />City would not be operator of the <br />service as the Alliance would be <br />handling all customer service, financial <br />and most decision making aspects. <br /> <br />As the Alliance's operating budget is <br />based entirely on grant funding, all <br />services the agency assumes must be <br />revenUe neutral The City would <br /> <br />I adjustments or recommendations, etc. guarantee grant shortfall funding within <br />i <br /> Alliance is responsible for all grant a pre-determined limit <br /> elements from reimbursement requests Due to Alliance budgetary and cash <br /> to reporting. Alliance invoices flow constraints, City would likely need <br /> employers and processes their I to pay Alliance in advance for shuttle <br /> payments. service. <br />I <br />, Pros - Alliance Cons - Alliance <br /> Easier to make direct changes to Requires Alliance Board of Directors' <br /> service. approval to add service and for a <br /> budgetary adjustment. <br /> Alliance has direct control over Potential cash flow concern related to <br /> <br />Page 3 of 7 <br />