My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
AgdaPkt 2002-10-28
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Agenda Packets
>
2000-2009 partial
>
2002
>
AgdaPkt 2002-10-28
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/5/2005 2:54:25 PM
Creation date
10/24/2002 3:20:03 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Agenda Packet
Agency Type
City Council
Date
10/28/2002
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
173
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Chairman Rolandelli added that ff the new distfivt was approved, the following <br />properties would now be covered under the Historic Preservation Ordinance and <br />have access to certain historic preservation benefits <br /> <br /> *.*o 800 Main Street <br /> 4° 839 Main Street <br /> **'o 847-849 Main Street <br /> <br />Chairman Rolandelli said that the UBerkeley extension Building" (address below) <br />is non-historic and would not be covered under the Histodc Preservation <br />Ordinance and no Histodc Preservation benefits would be available. This <br />property is included within the boundaries of the proposed district because of its <br />proximity to the heart of the proposed district. <br /> <br /> *.'o 1991 Broadway <br /> <br />Mr. Rolandelli presented a power point presentation discussing the different <br />properties. <br /> <br />Commissioner Radcliffe asked for clarification on the Federal Grant Program for <br />the Main Street District proprosal. <br /> <br />Commissioner Seybert had questions about the facility located at 1991 Broadway <br />set and said he wanted to know what was there before and what is there now. <br /> <br />Commissioner Piulle asked a question about the benefits of district designation <br />and asked about whether the programs involving property tax relief and mills act <br />agreements were voluntary or mandated agreements. <br /> <br />Mr. Rolandelli replied that these types of programs are activated by the property <br />owner, he explained that it's an incentive and not a requirement. <br /> <br />Commissioner Piulle asked how many properties at this moment in the proposed <br />Historic District are taking advantage of the Mills Act Agreement. <br /> <br />Mr. Rolandelli said thera are none. <br /> <br />Mr, Jany said that the HRAC has sent letters to all property owners of <br />designated historic properties and severl property owners have decided to <br />exercise certain histodc preservation options. <br /> <br />Commissioner Garcia said that it his understanding is that anyone who owns a <br />historic property can take it down and thera is nothing anybody can do to stop it. <br /> <br />Mr. Rolandelii said that a property, which is a designated Historic resource has a <br />review process to delay demolition, non designated historic properties could get <br />a demolition permit over the counter. <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.