Laserfiche WebLink
9A <br /> Page 32 <br /> Horgan Avenue. The Gas and Shop gas station consistently offers the lowest gasoline and <br /> diesel process on the peninsula, thereby attracting a very large customer base. lt should also <br /> be noted that the Gas and Shop alsa sells diesel fuef, which attracts large commercial big rigs <br /> and trucks which contribute to a traffic quagmire at this small intersection. To summarize, this <br /> location is currently enguffed in a traffic mess exasperated by the location, as mentioned above, <br /> by ane of the busiest car washes in San Mateo County and one of the busiest gas stations in <br /> Redwood City. <br /> In light of the above it becomes apparent that ingresslegress situation from Woodside Road <br /> onto Horgan Avenue and into our developmenf on Danbury Lane will become even more <br /> problematic unless the project is downsized or that ingress/egress is redesigned and/or limited <br /> in some fashion to Woodside Road. In addition, after hearing the presentation from the <br /> developer a couple of weeks ago and reading some of the associated infarmation supporting <br /> the project the following questions arise: how many of the proposed 96 parking spaces located <br /> within the proposed project will be designated as visitor and guest parking, wil{ such spaces be <br /> formaiiy designated witt� sigr�ag� s�ecifyi�ag guzst �aai�iii� wii�ii� ii�e faciiiiies Nainii�� JiIUC�IUIC� <br /> with forty three units and assuming that each uni#s occupants have a minimum of#wo cars tha# <br /> equates to 86 parking spaces leaving only nine spaces for guests and visitors. This will not be <br /> sufficient especially if the assumption is that the overflow parking needs will be satisfied by <br /> Fiorgan Avenue, where parking is presently almost non existent. Will the CC&R's of the new <br /> devefopment be specified as to limit the number of cars per condominium unit to mitigate the <br /> overflow paricing and traffic issues on#o Horgan Avenue? <br /> I am of ±he �nderstanding that the Planning Commission has v�eighted intc� at least c�ne ather <br /> similar project in Redwood City and has instituted a specific number limit per unit of car <br /> ownership via the CC&R's. Lastly, we have on previous occasions sent correspondence to <br /> Redwaod City Planning Department regarding our traffic and parking cancerns. i# is our hope <br /> that the afarementioned cancerrzs are dualiy and fully addressed before this praject is formally <br /> considered for approval." <br /> Diana Hallock, resident, is concerned with the safety of children and while painting a curb green <br /> m�y have an affect on #raffic it does not help having ingress/epress adiacent to a preschool is a <br /> disaster waiting ta happen. She has not been contacted regarding notices sent out by the City. <br /> Dale Reynolds, resident, stated that the parking is not enforced; it is the wrong size faciiity in the <br /> wrong place. The building is too big and will create traffic and traffic siudies do not work. <br /> 8��an oe�k, r�s�ue��t, t�te �roje�t is ircfudir� 70Q square feet ofi bicyc�e parking, if t"e bicycle <br /> space is going to be used,Woadside Road should be improved with bicycle lanes or same other <br /> considerations. There is an impact an house values by the new project and #he apartments that <br /> �re exist�ng. <br /> Robert Costa, resident, raised questions regarding traffic and should the carwash continue to be <br /> there. Some things can be done away with for #he new proposed development and will the <br /> permit for the car wash continue. <br /> Colfeen Lewis, resident, expresses some views regarding the traffic being extreme in the AM <br /> hours and commute time is increased. <br /> Kaia Eakin, resident, stated that she does not care for a devefoper who stated that if this project <br /> does not get done something worse will go in, She believes the project is too dense. <br /> Page 5 of 12 <br />