Laserfiche WebLink
7A <br /> Page 45 <br /> Gary Fisher, resident, stated that there is a lot of traffic going 50 MPH and accidents that <br /> occur; he suggests a speed limit of 25 MPH. <br /> Barbara Evans, resident, construction trucks are going up and down Edgewood Road <br /> and the intersection will be more severely impacted. She wauld like to see the delivery <br /> of construction materials restricted durir�g the peak hours. <br /> M/S (Codding/Gee) to close fhe Public Hearing. <br /> Motion Passed <br /> Commissioner RaciclEffe pointed aut that the hraspital has made parking arrangements fflr <br /> the staff and construction workers off-site. In some of the road assessments, Edgewood <br /> Road was only accessed from 280 to the Alamada and not further down. Why wasn't <br /> Edgewood looked at regarding a bike lane issue? Was there asbestos found in the <br /> serpentine, and are the trucks being covered when they are on the road? <br /> Commissioner Codd�ng referred to page 171 af the Draft �IR, Vol. 1, regarding the <br /> growth inducing impact. There is a sentence he does not understand "the conformance <br /> of the Precise P[an that the policies in the Genera! Plan would avoid or reduce significant <br /> impacts an the environments associaied with this new grawth in medical office space to <br /> the less than significant level." He suggests that there be a better explanation of this in <br /> the Final EIR. <br /> Commissioner Ges congratulated Sequoia Hospitaf, the community, and staff on this <br /> great project. He wauld like to see some Precise Plan objectives stated about the site <br /> lines from the residences on Upland Street. Regarding parking decks, ihere is a parking <br /> deck that is visible from the MOB parking up tawards the residentiai area, as we(I as the <br /> parking deck from the new parking structure. He would like to see some cornmentary <br /> regarding light pollut+on mitigation at night, assuming those parking decks will be <br /> illuminated at night. <br /> He wouid also like all rooftop equipment to be screened, Page 27, needs to be <br /> consistent with the definition of building heights. On illustration figure 10, elsvations <br /> given, he did not know what those numbers meant. It would be help#u( to find sorr�e <br /> elevations for the residentiaf hames on Upland. He woulcf like to see design guidelines <br /> for exterior signage. <br /> EER—MEti�a�!C.ns: Miti�ation 1.2, t?rriporar;� patches need to be done well and correctly <br /> regarding uEility connections. They should not just be a patched trenched area. The <br /> whole street needs to be re-paved. Mitigaiion C-TRAN — 1.2, it would be helpful io <br /> understand what a fair share contribution is and what they are contributing to. <br /> Known areas of cantroversy in the summary are the potential increase in trafiic and <br /> spillover int� residen# areas nesds to be better addressed. Figure 4.2-5, bus stop <br /> improvemerts, th� driveway ir;o the new parking str�ct�re shows it in and out, but the <br /> site plan shows an island in the loop road, so that no one can rnake a left turn into the <br /> first driveway into the parking garage, is thaf corract? <br /> Page 61, "access point should be monitored to determine the effect af volume," what <br /> happens if there are problems, and what would the solutions be to those problems? <br /> Ne mentioned �hai the truck routes in that area need more work. Regarding ihe <br /> Geologic Section, it does not propose piles and daes not encourage sheet piles, so he is <br /> Page 6 of 17 <br />