My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
AgdaPkt 2019-06-10 Joint SA PFA
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Agenda Packets
>
2010-2019
>
2019
>
AgdaPkt 2019-06-10 Joint SA PFA
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/24/2020 10:15:24 AM
Creation date
6/6/2019 4:04:36 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Agenda Packet
Meeting Type
Joint
Agency Type
City Council and Successor Agency and Public Financing Authority
Date
6/10/2019
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
739
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Your texts come across in an illegible manner so it's difficult to read the message. I'm against discrimination in general and particu larly against institution al <br />discrimination based on prejudices including lifestyle preferences <br />Absolutely opposed !!!! Against what they believe in! <br />1 - if u don't like it don't go there. It's that simple. <br />I won't eat there 2 <br />1 I have nothing wrong with restaurant or business owners having political opinions, but I'd prefer that a more healthy inexpensive food option be located on <br />that site. Chick-fil-A does not have many nutritious meals that don't involve fried chicken. <br />1 I had no idea of the political background of the restaurant! I also couldn't care less, I know members of my family drive across the bay because of the quality! <br />Remind me not to ever vote for this Supervisor in the future! <br />1- We should not be allowing ant!-LGBTQ businesses into our neighborhood. We need to send a message to these kinds of businesses that that kind of <br />prejudice <br />IAlthough restricting the use is based on good intentions,This is a form of censorship and leads to a very slippery slope. In this political climate we need to be <br />very cautious.Let the market dictate the success or failure of this location. <br />1 absolutely agree politics should not be the litmus test for a business operation unless it is proven beyond a doubt it would be detrimental to the community. <br />1 - strongly disagree.... Bring Chick fil a to the Peninsula - <br />1 Chick-fil-A doesn't discriminate against who they serve. <br />Thank you. I'm absolutely an opponent. Our community would be sending the wrong message if we allow a corporation that actively pursues <br />funding/supporting anti -gay agenda initiatives to claim our city as their home. <br />1 As a bisexual person who just moved into an apartment building near the site in question, I have no interest patronizing an establishment that funds <br />organizations working to vilify and erase people like me. I go to that McDonald's for my fast food cravings. If it were replaced with a Chick-fil-A, I would not <br />only avoid patronizing the new restaurant, I would actively organize protests outside. Ant!-LGBT+ businesses have a right to operate however they want, but <br />they do not belong in our inclusive neighborhood. <br />1. We should be building an inclusive community, not supporting those who spread hate! <br />11 agree that we need to stand up for the LGBTQ community. <br />1 There are plenty of welcoming, awesome restaurants. Who needs bigotry? <br />1 strongly disagree. I do not believe that Chick-fil-A represents our community and our culture. <br />1- too much traffic on whipper already. <br />11 have heard how delicious their food is so have long wanted to try it. However, my heart has to vote against to send a message of support for human rights. <br />1 We are better than this <br />2 - I don't know the city or county policies/rules for permitting though since I do not agree with Chick-fil-A mgmt support of anti-LGBTQ I will not support/go <br />there should it open. <br />1This isn't an issue of a political "litmus test:' It's not just about some CEO spouting distasteful opinions. This is about significant financial support for groups <br />spreading hate. Since they were boycotted their contributions to these groups have been greatly reduced but not eliminated. <br />1. We don't need bigoted companies & their behavior should not be endorsed by allowing them to open & make a profit. RWC needs to say No to Hate. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.