|
all applicable requirements of the State Planning and Zoning Law and the Redwood
<br />City Zoning Ordinance, to consider the appeal; and
<br />WHERAS, on September 18, 2018, the Appellant, the Applicant, and all
<br />other interested parties were given the opportunity to participate in the public
<br />hearing through oral testimony and the submittal of written comments; and
<br />WHEREAS, on September 18, 2018, the Planning Commission fully
<br />reviewed, considered, and evaluated the staff report prepared for the Project
<br />including the attachments to the staff report, oral and written public testimony,
<br />and all other documents and evidence in the public record on the Project and the
<br />appeal, and directed staff to collect additional information about the surrounding
<br />neighborhood; and
<br />WHEREAS, on December 4, 2018, the Planning Commission held a second
<br />public hearing on the Project, affording the Appellant, the Applicant and all other
<br />interested parties an opportunity to participate in the public hearing through oral
<br />testimony and the submittal of written comments; and
<br />WHEREAS, on December 4, 2018, the Planning Commission fully reviewed,
<br />considered, and evaluated the staff report prepared for the Project, including
<br />the additional information requested by the Planning Commission at its September
<br />18, 2018 meeting, as well as the attachments to the staff report, oral and written
<br />public testimony, and all other documents and evidence in the public record on the
<br />Project and the appeal; and
<br />WHEREAS, the Commission determined that the proposed house does not
<br />fit with the character of the neighborhood because of its size and design and that
<br />required Architectural Permit Finding C of the Redwood City Zoning Ordinance
<br />Section 45.4 cannot be made, and by a vote of 5 in favor and none opposed directed
<br />staff to return to the Commission with a resolution upholding the appeal.
<br />NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE PLANNING
<br />COMMISSION AS FOLLOWS:
<br />1. The Planning Commission finds that the above recitals are accurate
<br />and constitute findings in this matter, and with the staff reports, the application
<br />materials, development plan, and all other documents, reports, studies, memoranda,
<br />maps, oral and written testimony, and materials in the City's file or the application
<br />and the Project, and all adopted City planning documents relating to the Project and
<br />the property including the City's General Plan, Municipal Code, Zoning Ordinance,
<br />and other applicable City laws and regulations, have together served as an adequate
<br />and appropriate evidentiary basis for the findings and actions set forth in this
<br />Resolution.
<br />ATTY/RESO.0001/PC RESO UPHOLDING APPEAL FOR 288 JETER STREET
<br />REV: 01-04-19 PR
<br />Page 2 of 3
<br />
|