Laserfiche WebLink
b) The establishment, maintenance or operation of the use will not, under <br />circumstances of the particular case, be detrimental to the public health, <br />safety or welfare of persons residing or working in the neighborhood of the <br />proposed use, or the property and improvements in the neighborhood, or the <br />City. <br />Basis for finding: The proposed office use is compatible with other uses in <br />the vicinity and will not be detrimental to the public health, safety or welfare. <br />The office use is consistent with the Precise Plan and the Addendum to the <br />EIR did not identify any environmental impacts that would be detrimental to <br />the adjoining uses. The building has been designed to respect the adjacent <br />residential building. <br />Section 4. Planned Development Permit: In the exercise of its independent <br />judgement, the Commission finds that: <br />a). The design and construction quality contained in all aspects of the <br />development plan is expected to exceed the quality standards typically <br />required for new developments located in similar zoning districts. <br />Basis for finding: The building is designed with high quality materials and <br />architectural details, in that a variety of stone, thin brick, and metal paneling <br />with distinctive base, middle and top that creates interest in the architectural <br />design. The building design was supported by the Architectural Advisory <br />Committee <br />b. The proposed development will provide an environment of physical and <br />functional desirability, in harmony with the character of the surrounding <br />neighborhood or district. <br />Basis for finding: The proposed office development is design to be <br />compatible with the surrounding residential building and includes ground <br />floor transparency and an active use at the building corner. <br />Section 5. Tentative Map: In the exercise of its independent judgement, the <br />Commission finds that: <br />a) The map, design, or improvements of the proposed subdivision are <br />consistent with the general or specific plans, the zoning ordinance, or <br />subdivision improvement requirements. <br />Basis for finding: The proposed subdivision and associated improvements <br />are consistent with Redwood City's General Plan, Municipal Code, Zoning <br />Ordinance, Precise Plan, and all applicable subdivision improvement <br />requirements, in that the project meets the requirements for lot size and <br />width, as well as required improvements to the right-of-way. <br />b) The site is physically suited for the proposed type or density of development. <br />Basis for finding: The project site is physically suited for a six -story office <br />building with on-site parking. The site is flat and located in an urban <br />environment for which all public utilities and services are already established. <br />ATTY/RESO.0016/PC RESO APPROVING PERMITS FOR 610 WALNUT STREET <br />REV: 02-20-19 PR <br />Page 3 of 16 <br />