Laserfiche WebLink
(b) Airport noise concerns are normally directed at residential land uses. Office <br /> and commercial uses are generally deemed compatible with all but the highest <br /> noise levels. <br /> <br /> (c) San Mateo County's Airport Land Use Plan ("CLUP") has established the 55 <br /> dB CNEL noise contour as the noise impact boundary for the San Carlos <br /> Airport, based on the operating and noise characteristics of the general aviation <br /> aircraft that operate at the Airport. According to the CLUP, the Project is <br /> located within the CNEL 55-60 dB noise contour for the Airport. Under the <br /> CLI lP; h~siness and professional uses are considered compatible with noise <br /> levels up to CNEL 70 dB. <br /> <br />3.5.2 ~: The buildings in the Project may reflect noise from aircraft flying in <br /> the area, thereby increasing noise levels in adjacent residential communities. <br /> <br /> FAII0Jn~: The City hereby makes Finding (1). <br /> <br /> Facts in Support of Findings: <br /> <br /> (a) The finn of Charles M. Salter Associates Inc. prepared an assessment of noise <br /> from San Carlos Airport general aviation flyovers reflecting from the Project <br /> eastward to adjacent residences. This acoustical consulting firm has over 20 <br /> years' experience in the Bay Area. The engineer in charge has 20 years' <br /> experience with aircraft noise and is a licensed pilot. <br /> <br /> (b) The noise assessment concludes that reflected noise energy will increase the <br /> noise exposure to the nearest residential structure by less than 1 dB, an <br /> indiscernible change. <br /> <br /> (c) Because there is no significant noise impact from the Project, no noise <br /> mitigation measures are necessary. <br /> <br />3.6 SOCIO-ECONOMIC CONSIDERATIONS <br /> <br />3.6.1 ~: The Redwood Peninsula EIR states that development of the <br /> Redwood Peninsula as a whole will not necessarily result in community diversity, <br /> the satisfaction of housing needs, and relief from high district taxes, and that <br /> housing and employment relationships within the community will be weak. <br /> <br /> Eill.flillgl: The City hereby makes Finding (1). <br /> <br /> Facts in Support of Findings: <br /> <br /> (a) CEQA, the CEQA Guidelines and the courts have all determined that CEQA <br /> does not address social effects ora project without a physical change. (CEQA <br /> -16- <br /> £AFNDGCCDOC <br /> 7/11/96 9:56 AM <br /> <br /> <br />