Laserfiche WebLink
• Actively encourage and promote the preservation of Redwood City's historic <br />resources, and reduce the deferral of judgement on how to preserve them as <br />much as possible. <br />• Create a strong employment district and "vital center". <br />The project would revitalize a building, which has been vacant for several <br />years in a visible section of the downtown. The project would result in adaptive <br />re -use of a historic resource and would rehabilitate a vacant building into an <br />office space to strengthen the employment district. The proposed project would <br />modify the exterior fagade, completely renovate the interior, and perform <br />streetscape improvements. The interior has structural issues that would be fixed <br />as part of the project. The project does not seek any deviations from the <br />standards and guidelines of the DTPP and complies with historic preservation <br />requirements of the DTPP. <br />B. The establishment, maintenance or operation of the use will not, <br />under the circumstances of the particular case, be detrimental to the public <br />health, safety, or welfare of persons residing or working in the neighborhood of <br />the proposed use, or the property and improvements in the neighborhood, or <br />the City. <br />The project would not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or <br />welfare of the neighborhood. The project would take a derelict vacant building <br />and would completely renovate the interior of the building to be compliant with all <br />current code requirements for building and fire safety. The project would improve <br />the interior, exterior facade, utilities, and site improvements. <br />The project involves a change in use to a commercial office space and <br />would not expand any floor area. Under the DTPP, existing on-site parking is <br />considered sufficient for specified historic resources provided that the building is <br />not expanded and modifications are consistent with regulations specific to the <br />resource. Therefore, the project would comply with DTPP parking requirements. <br />In addition, the site would be adjacent to a city parking lot, Caltrain parking lot, <br />and walking distance to the Sequoia Station transit center. The site would <br />provide more employment next to a local and regional transit hub. <br />Section 4. Under Section 2.0.3.A.3 of the DTPP, the Planning Commission has <br />reviewed the Project and hereby finds that the Project is in conformance with the <br />applicable Historic Resources Preservation Standards and Guidelines of the DTPP. <br />Section 5. Under Section 2.1.4.A of the DTPP, the Planning Commission finds <br />that the Project conforms to the DTPP Additional Impact Mitigation Measures for <br />properties that contain historic resources to be preserved and complies with the <br />Secretary of Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation and Guidelines for Rehabilitating <br />Historic Buildings (1995), Weeks and Grimmer and analyzed in the historian's report by <br />M -Group, and would not adversely affect the character of the non -designated historic <br />resource. <br />Page 3 of 9 <br />ATTY/RES0.0084/PC RE50 55 PERRY <br />REV: 08-22-19 PR <br />