Laserfiche WebLink
substantial environmental damage, or substantially and avoidably injure <br />fish, wildlife, or their habitat, or cause serious public health problems. <br />The project site does not contain natural features or areas that would be <br />considered habitat for fish or wildlife. The environmental analysis for the project <br />evaluated the site as well as the channelized creek and concluded that no <br />special wildlife species was found or would potentially be on-site due to the lack <br />of suitable habitat characteristics. The proposed development will improve the <br />site with new pervious area and new landscaping. <br />d. The design or improvements of the proposed subdivision will not <br />conflict with essential public easements for access through, or use of, <br />property within the proposed subdivision, unless acceptable alternate <br />public easements will be provided. <br />The proposed tentative map and associated improvements does not conflict <br />with essential public easements for access through, or use of, property within <br />the proposed project site. Additionally, the project site does not have any public <br />utilities or associated improvements that would be in conflict with the proposed <br />project. <br />e. The reasons submitted for the granting of any exceptions applied for <br />comply with requirements for findings described in Section 30.69, and the <br />tentative map is deemed not workable without the granting of such <br />exceptions. <br />No exceptions to the Subdivision Ordinance are requested. <br />f. Such other findings of conflict with written public policy or with the <br />public interest as the Planning Commission may determine. <br />The proposed project does not conflict with any written public policy or with the <br />public interest. <br />g. In addition, the following finding is required by Government Code <br />Page 8 of 25 <br />ATTY/RESOS/2019/RESO.0081 PC RESO 1180 MAIN PROJECT APPROVAL <br />REV: 07-25-19 PR <br />