My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
Res13 15249
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Resolutions
>
City Council
>
Working
>
2010-2019
>
Res13 15249
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/11/2019 7:48:37 AM
Creation date
10/11/2019 7:48:36 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Resolution
Meeting Type
Regular
Agency Type
City Council
Date
3/11/2013
Description
RESOLUTION N0.15249 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF REDWOOD CITY DENYING THE APPEAL FILED BY ANDY SABERI, ANDY'S BP, INC. AND FIFTH AVENUE ENTERPRISES, INC., GRANTING THE APPEAL OF COSTCO WHOLESALE CORPORATION, AND MODIFYING THE PLANNING COMMISSION'S APPROVALS OF A USE PERMIT MODIFICATION AND A NEW ARCHITECTURAL PERMIT FOR THE COSTCO GASOLINE STATION EXPANSION PROJECT AT 2300 MIDDLEFIELD ROAD Costco Wholesale Corporation ("Applicant") submitted applications to the City of Redwood City ("City") for modification of existing Use Permit No. UP2011- 44, and a new Architectural Permit No. AP2011-43 to expand its gasoline station operations from 12 to 20 fueling positions at 2300 Middlefield Road ("Expansion Project"); and on October 16, 2012, the Planning Commission of the City of
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
10
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
03/11/2013 <br /> the potential environmental effects of a 16-pumpgasoline station. A Use Permit was <br /> previously approved for the 12-pump gasoline station, and the expansion to 20 fuel <br /> pumps would be an expansion of the existing use. <br /> b. The expanded use is compatible with the surrounding land uses <br /> comprised of commercial and industrial uses including Orchard Supply Hardware to the <br /> west, Safe Keep Storage to the east, Caltrain/UPRR railroad tracks to the south, and <br /> Sigona's market to the north. The Use Permit Modification is limited to the gasoline <br /> station expansion and resulting reconfiguration of the existing on-site parking spaces <br /> and internal vehicular circulation to accommodate the gasoline station expansion. <br /> c. The use and its associated structures and facilities will not be detrimental <br /> to the public health or safety, the general welfare, or the environment. The expansion of <br /> the gasoline station from 12 fuel pumps to 20 fuel pumps would not result in any new or <br /> more severe significant environmental impacts beyond those previously addressed in <br /> the 2007 EIR and Addendum No. 1,including noise, traffic, and air quality. <br /> d. The use and facilities will not adversely affect or conflict with adjacent <br /> uses or impede the normal development of surrounding property. The proposed use <br /> would be an expansion of a previously approved gas station use, with the expansion of <br /> fuel pumps expected to minimize vehicle queuing and wait times resulting in a reduction <br /> in impacts to air quality and greenhouse gas emissions. Furthermore, although the <br /> revised concept site plan dated November 9, 2012 would result in five (5) fewer parking <br /> spaces, there is adequate parking supply on the project site as document in the parking <br /> study; therefore, no new impacts to parking have been identified, compared to the <br /> previous Project. <br /> e. Adequate public and private facilities such as utilities, landscaping, <br /> parking spaces and traffic circulation measures are or will be provided for the proposed <br /> use. Adequate public and private facilities would be provided for the proposed use in <br /> that the demand for public services would be served by current facilities. Payment of <br /> development impact fees would allow school services to provide adequate services, and <br /> annual review of service levels for fire and police services would ensure acceptable <br /> levels are maintained. All private facilities including landscaping, parking and traffic <br /> circulation management would be provided and maintained by the Applicant in <br /> accordance with the City's requirements. <br /> f. Other findings required to be made in specific zoning districts as set forth <br /> in the Zoning Code. There are no additional findings that need to be made for the <br /> proposed use. <br /> Section 6. Architectural Permit AP2011-43: The City Council finds that: <br /> a. Sufficient variety in the design of the structure and grounds to avoid <br /> monotony in the external appearance of the project: The design of the canopy extension <br /> ATTY/RES0.2816/COSTCO RESO.#15249 <br /> REV:03-12-13 VR MUFF#603 <br /> Page 4 of 9 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.